Skip to main content

star trek - How did Tom Paris come up with this warp to miles-per-second estimate in The 37s?


Update
For the duplicate flag: I am not asking why Voyager would take 75 years to return home, but rather, assuming that is true, I question the accuracy of Tom's statement (below).



In Voyager season 2 episode 1 The 37s, Tom tells Amelia Earhart that warp 9.9 is approximately 4 billion miles per second. The back of the envelope math shows, based on that, they could travel 70000 lightyears in 3.25 years at warp 9.9.

While I understand that it's not feasible to travel at high warp for an indefinite amount of time, Voyager is rated to top out at Warp 9.975 which is even faster than 9.9, so I don't understand the 75 year estimate (approximately 1000 lightyear/year) to get back to earth. Also it was odd that Tom used mph versus kph, but I assume its because he knew Earhart's generation used imperial units instead of metric.


The speed of light 299792458 metres/s, 1609 metres to a mile is ~186171 miles/s so 70000 lightyears is 186171 miles × 60 seconds × 60 minutes × 24 hours × 365 days × 70000 = 410976205920000000 miles. Now divide by 4000000000 yields 102744000 seconds, and 102744000/60/60/24/365 is around 3.258 years at warp 9.9.



So was Tom's number just pulled out from thin air?



Answer



More or less he made it up. There's a couple of things to back this up



  1. Star Trek does everything in the metric system. Of course, that would confuse Earhart, because a good portion of the world converted long after 1937 (the UK didn't formally start until 1965 and the US has not switched). So Tom is probably picking a number and then slapping a MPH onto it, since he doesn't consult anything to try and make a realistic conversion from metric to imperial. The fact that it's such a large and neatly round number also leads one to conclude it's off-the-cuff.


  2. The transcript leaves the impression he's trying to impress the lady. Take note of the context



    (Amelia is admiring the helm.)
    AMELIA: How fast?

    PARIS: Warp nine point nine. In your terms, that's about four billion miles a second.
    AMELIA: Think I could take her out for a spin?
    PARIS: Well, er



    This bolsters point #1. "In your terms" points to an off-the-cuff number. I mean, you're trying to explain warp drive to a person whose fastest form of transportation was about 200MPH (or 0.05 miles per second).




If we take Memory Alpha's numbers about warp 9.975 (which canon kinda plays fast and loose with anyways), 1721c converts to about 320M miles per second, and 2922c is about 522M miles per second


I think he's trying to say his warp drive brings all the ladies to his sector, and it's better than yours.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF
Post a Comment
Read more

Which Doctor Who works are canon?

I have been watching a Doctor Who documentary and they mentioned that Paul McGann did audio stories so he wasn't just a one-hit Doctor (and that there are novels featuring his Doctor as well). My question is: is Doctor Who canon just the show, or is it like Star Wars where some books and audios are canon and some are not? The documentary also shows that before 2005 they did audio stories where the Doctor is female and obviously that cannot be — not the female part, but the show doesn't count any female Doctors in episodes like The Day of the Doctor . Answer Nothing, and also everything The definitive piece of writing on Doctor Who canon is this blog post by writer Paul Cornell . I'm essentially going to be summarizing his post here, much less eloquently, but one section I want to quote directly is this: Nobody at the BBC has ever uttered a pronouncement about what is and isn't canonical. (As I'm sure they'd put it, being such enthusiasts for good grammar.) Be...
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more