Skip to main content

Why does the piece of Voldemort's soul attach itself to the only living thing i.e. Harry?


Possibly Related:


What EXACTLY cause Voldemort's soul piece to split off when he killed Lily and tried to kill Harry?


How Would Harry Breaking the Unbreakable Vow Have Affected the Piece of Voldemort's Soul?



We know that apart from Harry and Nagini - all the other pieces of Voldemort's soul were enclosed in some container. So why did the soul that split when the Killing Curse rebounded attach itself to the only living thing? Moreover - since Voldemort had other Horcruxes to keep him from dying - why didn't it attach itself to Voldemort himself? We know that the piece of soul in Slytherin's locket put up a fight to leave the container. How then did the last piece leave Voldemort's body and attach itself to Harry's?



Answer




The piece of the Dark Lord’s soul embedded itself in Harry because Harry was the only living soul in the room. Disembodied souls naturally only would be able to stay in other living things. They’re only able to stay in inanimate objects when they’re deliberately sealed into them by the spell used to make a Horcrux. The piece that broke off of the Dark Lord, however, wasn’t deliberately encased in anything, so it stuck itself in the only living soul nearby.



“Tell him that on the night Lord Voldemort tried to kill him, when Lily cast her own life between them as a shield, the Killing Curse rebounded upon Lord Voldemort, and a fragment of Voldemort’s soul was blasted apart from the whole, and latched itself on to the only living soul left in that collapsing building.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 33 (The Prince’s Tale)



This bit of soul is different than a Horcrux, because in making a Horcrux, the wizard creating it intentionally encases it in an object using a spell. Pieces of soul don’t naturally attach themselves to inanimate objects, they tend towards wanting to embed themselves in something living.




“Killing rips the soul apart. The wizard intent upon creating a Horcrux would use the damage to his advantage: he would encase the torn portion –’


‘Encase? But how –?’


‘There is a spell, do not ask me, I don’t know!’ said Slughorn, shaking his head like an old elephant bothered by mosquitoes.”
- Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 23 (Horcruxes)



The other instances of souls finding new hosts indicate that it’s much easier for soul pieces to enter living hosts on their own, without the magic required to seal them in an inanimate object. Even pieces already sealed in a Horcrux can temporarily possess living people. Though the soul piece in a Horcrux is dependent on its object, it can still possess other bodies, though not objects.



“The bit of soul in that diary was possessing Ginny, wasn’t it? How does that work, then?’


‘While the magical container is still intact, the bit of soul inside it can flit in and out of someone if they get too close to the object.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 6 (The Ghoul in Pyjamas)




When he was ripped from his body, the Dark Lord could also possess bodies, of humans as well as animals. He likely couldn’t possess inanimate objects, though, it seems limited to living bodies.



“Only one power remained to me. I could possess the bodies of others. But I dared not go where other humans were plentiful, for I knew that the Aurors were still abroad and searching for me. I sometimes inhabited animals – snakes, of course, being my preference – but I was little better off inside them than as pure spirit, for their bodies were ill-adapted to perform magic … and my possession of them shortened their lives; none of them lasted long …”
- Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Chapter 33 (The Death Eaters)



This also explains why the piece of soul didn’t just reattach itself to the Dark Lord - he was ripped from his body, so at that point he provided no body for the soul piece to attach to.



“Aaah … pain beyond pain, my friends; nothing could have prepared me for it. I was ripped from my body, I was less than spirit, less than the meanest ghost … but still, I was alive.”
- Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Chapter 33 (The Death Eaters)




Therefore, the piece of soul that fractured off the Dark Lord’s couldn’t attach itself to an inanimate object, and it couldn’t reattach to the Dark Lord as he was bodiless. Harry was its only choice.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...