Skip to main content

the witcher - Why did Geralt drink Black Gull in the first place?


In the short story Something more from Sword of Destiny why did Geralt drink the black gull to hallucinate in the first place? What was his goal?



Answer



At first I thought he drank it for helping heal his wounds, but then his dialog with Visenna (ostensibly his mother) suggests that this was not the reason:



"Later", she continued and pulled his shirt up to his neck, "a blood poisoning was added to it, like it's usually the case with bite wounds. It was slowed down. Of course a witcher elixier? That hepled much. But I don't understand why you took hallucinogens at the same time?"




So they didn't directly help with healing his wounds. It might be, as a comment points out, that he took them as painkillers. But I think there is even more to this idea and it's something else that Visenna says:



As part of this sympathy, a friendly advice, or if you want, an advice from the healer. Stop taking hallucinogens, Geralt. Hallucinogens don't help. Against nothing.



And this actually sounds much more reminiscent of drugs, even more so the motif of people (unsuccessfully) searching a solution to their problems in drugs. And I think this might very well be what Geralt ultimately did here.


Now what happened before his encoutner with Yurga and the fight on the bridge? Geralt learned that Ciri is likely dead, dieing when Nilfgaard attacked Cintra, and as a result of this he fled with Dandelion to the North (his third vision actually). And even more than that, he feels directly responsible for her death. We learn this in his visions.


The first of which is about a meeting with Yenefer during Belleteyn. He might even think by this point already that Yenefer died at the Battle of Sodden Hill (we learn later that this is not the case, but it's what he thinks when visiting the gravestone). And this vision ends with Yenefer reminding Geralt to go to Cintra and get Ciri, for Yenefer thinks she'll be in danger. (And she says this no less after talking with Geralt yet again about their inability to have their own children, reinforcing the idea of Ciri being Geralt's foster child.)



"Ride to Cintra. Ride there and don't deny this time. Don't do like back then...when you were there..."

"How do you know?"
"I know everything about you. Did you forget? Ride to Cintra, ride there as fast as possible. Bad times are coming, Geralt. Very bad. You got to make it..."



And in his second hallucination/flashback we learn how he was there the first time and denied to take Ciri with him. He said he doesn't believe in destiny and that he would take it upon him to tempt it and violate its rules.


But ultimately he realizes (or thinks) that it's not just on him to deal with the consequences of tempting destiny. Ciri is dead because he didn't take her with him. He did not make it there in time (it's his third vision where he learns about her death and where he's actually just on his way to Cintra). There's this telling line in his dialogue to Yurga:



"No, Sir. If I find something at home, it has to be predestined. And if you play with destiny, if you lie to it, it punishes you hard."
I know, the witcher thought. I know.



So while Geralt isn't always a man of big emotions, I think what we actually have here is a witcher struck by his guilt over a loss he himself feels responsible for.



So what does that have to do with him taking hallucinogens? Well, why do people flee themselves into hallucinations? He might either be trying to gain insights from it that make him see a bigger purpose in all that. Or he might just want to flee himself into his past experiences, bathing in self-pity over the mistakes he made back then, reliving those events yet again.


He is ultimately trying to search for answers in his past rather than looking into the future, which might as well be what Visenna alluded to when she said that "hallucinogens never help".




The excerpts here have been translated into English by me from Erik Simon's official German translation of Sword of Destiny.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...