Skip to main content

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?



In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'.


We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)?


In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans?



Answer




While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once.



“He pulled the old copy of Advanced Potion-Making out of his bag and tapped the cover with his wand, muttering, ‘Diffindo!’ The cover fell off. He did the same thing with the brand new book (Hermione looked scandalised). He then swapped the covers, tapped each and said, ‘Reparo!”
- Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 11 (Hermione’s Helping Hand)




However, when Harry cast Sectumsempra on Draco, Snape had to use the counter-curse multiple times.



“Pushing Harry roughly aside, he knelt over Malfoy, drew his wand and traced it over the deep wounds Harry’s curse had made, muttering an incantation that sounded almost like song. The flow of blood seemed to ease; Snape wiped the residue from Malfoy’s face and repeated his spell. Now the wounds seemed to be knitting.”
- Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 24 (Sectumsempra)



After repeating the counter-curse three times, Snape still had to take Draco to the hospital wing, and that was with Harry not even knowing what the spell did and never having cast it before. Presumably it could be even more damaging when used by someone experienced, and may have more severe effects in that case.



“When Snape had performed his counter-curse for the third time, he half-lifted Malfoy into a standing position. ‘You need the hospital wing. There may be a certain amount of scarring, but if you take dittany immediately we might avoid even that … come …”
- Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 24 (Sectumsempra)




Additionally, it takes that specific counter-curse to even have a chance of healing the wounds Sectumsempra creates. When George’s ear is cut off, his mother (and the rest of the Order) can’t make it grow back because Sectumsempra is dark magic.



“Mrs Weasley had staunched his bleeding now, and by the lamplight Harry saw a clean, gaping hole where George’s ear had been.


‘How is he?’


Mrs Weasley looked round and said, ‘I can’t make it grow back, not when it’s been removed by Dark Magic. But it could have been so much worse … he’s alive.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 5 (Fallen Warrior)



Though they both have the effect of cutting, Diffindo is more easily countered and doesn’t leave the cuts is makes as difficult to heal by the usual magical methods.



As is seen when Hermione accidentally cuts Ron with it, Diffindo, the Severing Charm, can possibly cause pain when used on flesh.




“D – Diffindo,’ she said, pointing her wand at Ron, who roared in pain as she slashed open the knee of his jeans, leaving a deep cut. ‘Oh, I’m so sorry, Ron, my hand’s shaking! Diffindo!’ The severed ropes fell away. Ron got to his feet, shaking his arms to regain feeling in them.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 9 (A Place to Hide)



However, there’s a way to use it painlessly for amputation, since Newt Scamander mentions that owners of Crups are required by law to use a painless Severing Charm to remove their tail.



“Crup owners are legally obliged to remove the Crup’s tail with a painless Severing Charm while the Crup is six to eight weeks old, lest Muggles notice it.”
- Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them



There doesn’t seem to be any evidence that Sectumsempra can be used painlessly, though it’s impossible to rule it out entirely, it seems unlikely from what’s known about its effects.




When George’s ear is cut off by Sectumsempra, his mother mentions that the spell used was Dark magic.



“Mrs Weasley looked round and said, ‘I can’t make it grow back, not when it’s been removed by Dark Magic. But it could have been so much worse … he’s alive.”
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter 5 (Fallen Warrior)



By contrast, Diffindo doesn’t seem to be classified as Dark magic. Ron uses it in fourth year to remove lace from the secondhand dress robes his mother bought him. It’s highly unlikely he’d use Dark magic, especially for such a relatively simple task (easily accomplished by scissors) in a fairly non-urgent situation.



“In a desperate attempt to make them look more manly, he used a Severing Charm on the ruff and cuffs. It worked fairly well; at least he was now lace-free, although he hadn’t done a very neat job, and the edges still looked depressingly frayed as they set off downstairs.”
- Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Chapter 23 (The Yule Ball)




Sectumsempra therefore would be classified as Dark magic, while Diffindo would not. There are practical differences in how Dark magic affects what it’s used on, like its making the wounds it creates difficult to heal, which differentiates the two spells in their respective effects. Also, its classification as Dark magic would make certain wizards who’d willingly use Diffindo unwilling to use Sectumsempra, even for the same things they’d use Diffindo for, because they don’t want to use magic considered Dark.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...