Skip to main content

comics - Since every zombie appears to be rotting, does their functional afterlife vary with their exposure to the elements?


Would a basement bound zombie function longer than a zombie that was trapped on the roof of a building and exposed to the elements? EDIT- All the zombies seem to exibit signs of decay. They appear to be rotting from the moment they transform.




Answer



Walkers are subject to the effects of their environment. However, in most cases the difference between normal continuous exposure to the elements and a sheltered indoor existence would not result in a significant difference in the walker's ability to function.


In most zombie lore, the normal healing factors stop functioning once the victim goes through the initial death. Broken bones do not mend. Cuts do not heal.


I have not read far enough into the comics to have seen any demonstration of this, but in season 2 of the show, in the episode Cherokee Rose, they find a walker trapped in one of their wells. As can be seen, long-term exposure has had a major impact on the walker's physical condition:


A face only a mother walker could love


Not only has the flesh become unusually bloated, but also



the walker's physical integrity has weakened to the point where the body simply splits apart when they try to haul it out of the well.



The ease with which this occurs is significantly different than the ability of other walkers we see to hold weight, and seems almost certainly due to the long-term exposure to the water in the well.



While sitting in the bottom of a well for days, if not weeks, on end is significantly different than getting rained on occasionally, it does demonstrate that walker flesh likely has the same atrophying characteristics generally associated with zombie lore. This makes it likely that a walker that is kept inside would be in better condition than one who had spent an extended amount of time outside, as the exposure to wind, sun, freezing temperatures, and alternating periods of dry and wet would likely result in the accumulation of minor skin damage.


However, barring serious environmental impact (such as alternating periods of freezing and thawing, or debris blown by storm-force winds), any damage caused by exposure to the elements would likely be superficial. As it has been demonstrated that walkers can function while missing entire sections of their bodies, damage to, or even complete loss of skin would be unlikely to hamper them significantly.


It remains to be seen whether loss of skin would shorten the "lifespan" of a walker significantly. This largely depends on whether they eventually cease to function on their own, without traumatic injury to the brain. To my knowledge, this is not something that has come up in the comics, and is certainly not something yet addressed by the show.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...