Skip to main content

doctor who - How did the chameleon circuit break?


There is already a question asking: Has the TARDIS's chameleon circuit always been broken?


The consensus seems to be 'Yes'. The question I'd like know, is how did it break?



Answer



tl;dr: It is never stated how the chameleon circuit broke, only that it's broken and that The Doctor has no real intention of fixing it. Four claims that he actually stole an already-broken TARDIS from the shop and it's been that way ever since.



Interesting note: the outside of the TARDIS does change form on occasion (out-of-universe, as they replace the props :); it simply keeps changing into different forms of a police box. The shape of the lamp changed on several occasions, the shade of blue got deeper, the color and shape of the "instructions sign" has changed, etc. This matches up with what Eleven tells Amy is the problem: when it lands, the TARDIS performs a complex analysis of its surroundings to determine the best shape to take, then re-disguises itself as a 1960's police box every time.


We do know a little bit about when it broke. Of course, this is Doctor Who, so we obviously have contradictory information about when it broke, depending on what you consider canon.


TV Information


The very first time we see the TARDIS, in the pilot episode, it has taken on the form of a 1960's police box. This implies that the TARDIS was working when it landed in 1963 London, since police boxes would have been a legitimate disguise, and broke soon afterward. From that point forward, it is stuck in that form. Both The Doctor and Susan claim they don't know what's wrong with it, and it seems to distress One quite a bit, but the whole matter is largely dropped.


Later, during The Fourth Doctor's run, we learn a bit more. Four claims that it was broken when he stole it, and that he basically hijacked a TARDIS from the repair shop. He also seems much less worried about repairing it, though he implies that he knows exactly what's wrong with it and how to fix it. (It's not clear why it would choose to look like a 1963 police box while in the repair shop on Gallifrey...)


During Attack of the Cybermen, Six did manage to "repair" it temporarily, but in actuality he made things worse, and it quickly reverted to its police box form.


Much later on, Nine and Eleven each imply to his respective companions that he could fix the circuit, if he wanted to. Eleven tells Amy that he hasn't gotten around to it yet, but I think Nine was the most honest when he tells Rose that he has just grown attached to its shape, and wants it to stay that way. Donna also begins to tell Ten how to fix it, before he brain fries.


Also of interesting note is that several other Time Lords, including the Master on more than one occasion, have stolen and made repairs to the Doctor's TARDIS, and none of them have ever bothered to fix the circuit.


Supplemental Material


A quick perusal of the TARDIS wikia also turns up some audio or printed stories that involve the chameleon circuit, though of course some of it contradicts the TV canon. There are stories from the First Doctor's pre-TV adventures where it was working, partly contradicting Four's story that it was broken when he stole it. It's possible that the broken circuit "sort of" worked until it got stuck as a police box, and hasn't worked since.



In one of Five's audio stories. Nyssa actually repairs it completely; it subsequently turns into a whale and forgets that it's a TARDIS, and The Doctor is forced to re-break it to get things back to normal. This, again, implies that it could be fixed, if The Doctor really wanted to.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...