Skip to main content

harry potter - Snape's curious reaction in The Goblet of Fire


Every time I reread The Goblet Of Fire I stumble on one sentence:



"I saw Voldemort come back!" Harry shouted. He tried to get out of bed again, but Mrs. Weasley forced him back. "I saw the Death Eaters! I can give you their names! Lucius Malfoy..."


Snape made a sudden movement, but as Harry looked at him, Snape's eyes flew back to Fudge.



It looks like one of those small details in a book that should be clear to the readers if they know the background. Something similar to the swift mention here:



For a fleeting instant, Harry thought he saw a gleam of something like triumph in Dumbledore's eyes. But next second Harry was sure he had imagined it




This detail about Dumbledore's reaction rises questions at first, but gets the explanation later in the story.


But in Snape's case it is not obvious at all (to me at least) what Rowling meant by this curious reaction. Did Snape react to Harry naming Death Eaters openly? Did he react to Malfoy's name specifically?


I feel like Rowling meant something specific here but I just can't get the point of it.



Answer



Snape and Lucius were old friends.


As I learned from this excellent answer on another SE site, there was more to the relationship between Severus Snape and Lucius Malfoy than just both of them having been Death Eaters and the former favouritising the latter's son for years.




  • From Snape's very first day at Hogwarts:




    And Severus Snape moved off to the other side of the Hall, away from Lily, to where the Slytherins were cheering him, to where Lucius Malfoy, a prefect badge gleaming upon his chest, patted Snape on the back as he sat down beside him ...


    -- HP and the Deathly Hallows, "The Prince's Tale"





  • Narcissa also refers to them as old friends:



    "Severus ... please ... You are, you have always been, Draco's favorite teacher ... You are Lucius's old friend ... I beg you ... You are the Dark Lord's favorite, his most trusted advisor .. Will you speak to him ... persuade him."


    -- HP and the Half-Blood Prince, "Spinner's End"






  • And Sirius, admittedly in full taunt mode, calls Snape Lucius's "lapdog":



    "Tell me, how is Lucius Malfoy these days? I expect he's delighted that his lapdog's working at Hogwarts, isn't he?"


    -- HP and the Order of the Phoenix, "Occlumency"






None of these quotes is really conclusive on its own, but taken together they point towards Snape having been a friend, perhaps even something of a protege, to Lucius during their Hogwarts years. To an unpopular boy from a poor background like Snape, any encouragement from a rich prefect like Lucius could have meant a lot.


Moving forwards to the time of HP and the Goblet of Fire, how is the relationship between the two now? Snape defected away from the Death Eaters at the end of the First Wizarding War, but presumably Lucius doesn't know that, and there's no reason why Snape would automatically hate all his old Death Eater friends just because he betrayed their leader who killed the woman he loved. It's quite possible that Snape and Lucius had continued to have a cordial friendship through all the intervening years.


Then, why the sudden movement? Surely Snape must have known that Lucius would still be a committed Death Eater when Voldemort returned, and therefore the two would be on opposite sides in the upcoming conflict. But it seems to be an involuntary reaction, so rationalisations like this don't necessarily work, even for such an accomplished Occlumens (implying immense self-control) as Snape. His thoughts might have been "oh no, my old friend's going to be an enemy! ... meh, I guess I should have known that". Or he might have hoped that Lucius wouldn't want to risk his cushy job and power at the Ministry for the chance of a different kind of power under a returning Voldemort.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...