Skip to main content

history - Does Harry Potter contradict any historical events?


Which historical events are different in Harry Potter, than they are in recorded history? I'm not looking for the major things that the books add in (i.e. magic), but for small things.



Answer



The generally accepted timeline is that Philosopher’s Stone is the school year 1991–2, and extrapolate outwards from there. This has been confirmed by multiple canon sources; see other sites and/or answers for details.



Given that timeline, here are some mistakes:




  • The days of the week are generally inconsistent.


    For example, we know that Philosopher’s Stone starts on the 1st November 1981 (the day after Harry’s parents were killed). And in the first chapter it says



    When Mr and Mrs Dursley woke up on the dull, grey Tuesday our story starts



    But that day was actually a Sunday.


    There are many similar mistakes like this in the book, where the stated day doesn’t match the actual date. A common example is the fact that 2nd September is always a Monday for each year that Harry attends Hogwarts. The days move each year, so that’s clearly impossible – in fact, it was only a Monday in 1991 and 1996 (so Stone and Prince).





  • The facts about the Prime Minister seem off.


    In the beginning of Half-Blood Prince (so around 1996), we meet the Muggle Prime Minister. When he recalls his first meeting with the Minister for Magic, Fudge says:



    “And I must say, you’re taking it a lot better than your predecessor. He tried to throw me out of the window, thought I was a hoax planned by the opposition.”



    We don’t know exactly when this first meeting took place, except that it occurred before 1993 – he was in office when Sirius Black escaped from Azkaban.


    The same Prime Minister was in office from 1993 to 1996, and a few years at either end – John Major – but his predecessor was Margaret Thatcher, for whom “he” would be inappropriate.


    It’s also worth noting that the fictional Prime Minister recalls a recent election campaign:




    Naturally, he had thought that the long campaign and the strain of the election had caused him to go mad.



    John Major became Prime Minister midway through a Parliament, when Michael Heseltine challenged Thatcher for leadership of the party. This was technically an election, but it would be hard to describe it as “long”. Heseltine’s challenge came in mid-November, and balloting was in December. It sounds more like this Prime Minister went through an election, and likely saw off an incumbent Government to boot.




  • Dudley has a PlayStation before it was ever released.


    From Harry’s letter to Sirius at the beginning of Goblet of Fire:



    They told him they’d have to cut his pocket money if he keeps doing it, so he got really angry and chucked his PlayStation out of the window. That’s a sort of computer thing you can play games on. Bit stupid really, now he hasn’t even got Mega-Mutilation Part Three to take his mind off things.




    That would take place in summer 1994. But the original PlayStation wasn’t introduced until December of the same year, so it must have been released earlier in the fictional universe.


    See also: How could Dudley have wrecked his PlayStation if the PlayStation didn't exist yet?


    And there has never been a real video game called Mega-Mutilation Part Three, released in 1994 or otherwise.




If we start clutching at straws and/or moving into lesser canon material:




  • Bonfire Night has moved to later in the year.



    In the UK, Bonfire Night is usually celebrated on 5th November. On the Tuesday when the story starts, the weather reporter says (of celebrations of Voldemort’s downfall):



    Perhaps people have been celebrating Bonfire Night early – it’s not until next week, folks!



    Voldemort was killed the previous day, which makes this 1st November, and a Tuesday (see above). I wouldn’t describe the following Saturday as “next week” – for me, that phrase means the following Monday or later.




  • In HP, King Arthur might have lived considerably later than he actually did.


    According to legend, King Arthur defended Britain from Saxon invaders in the 5th and 6th centuries AD. There are also chocolate frog cards written by Rowling that have Merlin as an advisor in King Arthur’s court.


    But the Slytherin welcome letter on Pottermore says:




    Here’s a little-known fact that the other three houses don’t bring up much: Merlin was a Slytherin. Yes, Merlin himself, the most famous wizard in history! He learned all he knew in this very house! Do you want to follow in the footsteps of Merlin?



    Since Hogwarts wasn’t founded until the 10th century AD, this seems to suggest that Arthur’s lived quite a lot later than contemporary legend.


    (Alternative explanations are that the Slytherin prefect has made this up, or Merlin lived for several centuries.)




  • The Dursleys have a car that’s about ten years too early.


    In the Order of the Phoenix film, we see their number plate quite clearly: MA06 HBH. Nominally this scene takes place in the summer of 1995.


    enter image description here



    But there are two things wrong here:



    1. The age identifier on that plate tells us it was issue in mid 2006. (See DVLA’s document on registration number formats, page 6)

    2. That’s a fifth-generation Vauxhall Astra, which wasn’t released until 2004.


    Likewise in Deathly Hallows: Part 1, they’re still driving the same, out-of-time car model, but the plate has changed:


    enter image description here


    The age identifier is now “07”, meaning a mid-2007 issue date. That is still far too new.





  • The Death Eaters attack a London that’s way out-of-place.


    In Half-Blood Prince scene with the Prime Minister, there’s a line about the destruction of the Brockdale Bridge, which must have occurred in early 1996.


    This scene is reproduced in the Half-Blood Prince, but the London it depicts doesn’t match up to the supposed timeline:




    • We see the Gherkin in a reflection, even though it wouldn’t start construction for another four years:


      enter image description here




    • They attack the Millennium Bridge, standing in for the Brockdale Bridge. But as the name implies, it wasn’t built until 2000, at the turn of the millennium.



      enter image description here






I’m sure I could go on, but I think this gets the general gist across – there are a few inconsistencies in the books, particularly when it comes to details like days of the week, but most major historical events are in line. The movies drift more significantly, as a result of them being shot significantly after the books are set.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

harry potter - Does Animagus transformation alter the level of intelligence?

I found this quote: No spell yet devised enables wizards to fly unaided in human form. Those few Animagi who transform into winged creatures may enjoy flight, but they are a rarity. The witch or wizard who finds him- or herself transfigured into a bat may take to the air, but, having a bat’s brain, they are sure to forget where they want to go the moment they take flight. Quidditch Through the Ages - Page 1 - Scholastic Edition at this place: https://scifi.stackexchange.com/a/7783/13716 Since it is from a reputable user I doubt the quote is wrong However, this raises the question, does changing into an animal also change one's level of intelligence into that animal? The way the Animagi in the books act in their animal form sort of indicates that they keep their human level intelligence (for example, Rita Skeeter, in terms of intelligence, should have been on the lowest end of the scale when transformed, but still she is able to find out information as a beetle, as well as remember...