Skip to main content

history - Does Harry Potter contradict any historical events?


Which historical events are different in Harry Potter, than they are in recorded history? I'm not looking for the major things that the books add in (i.e. magic), but for small things.



Answer



The generally accepted timeline is that Philosopher’s Stone is the school year 1991–2, and extrapolate outwards from there. This has been confirmed by multiple canon sources; see other sites and/or answers for details.



Given that timeline, here are some mistakes:




  • The days of the week are generally inconsistent.


    For example, we know that Philosopher’s Stone starts on the 1st November 1981 (the day after Harry’s parents were killed). And in the first chapter it says



    When Mr and Mrs Dursley woke up on the dull, grey Tuesday our story starts



    But that day was actually a Sunday.


    There are many similar mistakes like this in the book, where the stated day doesn’t match the actual date. A common example is the fact that 2nd September is always a Monday for each year that Harry attends Hogwarts. The days move each year, so that’s clearly impossible – in fact, it was only a Monday in 1991 and 1996 (so Stone and Prince).





  • The facts about the Prime Minister seem off.


    In the beginning of Half-Blood Prince (so around 1996), we meet the Muggle Prime Minister. When he recalls his first meeting with the Minister for Magic, Fudge says:



    “And I must say, you’re taking it a lot better than your predecessor. He tried to throw me out of the window, thought I was a hoax planned by the opposition.”



    We don’t know exactly when this first meeting took place, except that it occurred before 1993 – he was in office when Sirius Black escaped from Azkaban.


    The same Prime Minister was in office from 1993 to 1996, and a few years at either end – John Major – but his predecessor was Margaret Thatcher, for whom “he” would be inappropriate.


    It’s also worth noting that the fictional Prime Minister recalls a recent election campaign:




    Naturally, he had thought that the long campaign and the strain of the election had caused him to go mad.



    John Major became Prime Minister midway through a Parliament, when Michael Heseltine challenged Thatcher for leadership of the party. This was technically an election, but it would be hard to describe it as “long”. Heseltine’s challenge came in mid-November, and balloting was in December. It sounds more like this Prime Minister went through an election, and likely saw off an incumbent Government to boot.




  • Dudley has a PlayStation before it was ever released.


    From Harry’s letter to Sirius at the beginning of Goblet of Fire:



    They told him they’d have to cut his pocket money if he keeps doing it, so he got really angry and chucked his PlayStation out of the window. That’s a sort of computer thing you can play games on. Bit stupid really, now he hasn’t even got Mega-Mutilation Part Three to take his mind off things.




    That would take place in summer 1994. But the original PlayStation wasn’t introduced until December of the same year, so it must have been released earlier in the fictional universe.


    See also: How could Dudley have wrecked his PlayStation if the PlayStation didn't exist yet?


    And there has never been a real video game called Mega-Mutilation Part Three, released in 1994 or otherwise.




If we start clutching at straws and/or moving into lesser canon material:




  • Bonfire Night has moved to later in the year.



    In the UK, Bonfire Night is usually celebrated on 5th November. On the Tuesday when the story starts, the weather reporter says (of celebrations of Voldemort’s downfall):



    Perhaps people have been celebrating Bonfire Night early – it’s not until next week, folks!



    Voldemort was killed the previous day, which makes this 1st November, and a Tuesday (see above). I wouldn’t describe the following Saturday as “next week” – for me, that phrase means the following Monday or later.




  • In HP, King Arthur might have lived considerably later than he actually did.


    According to legend, King Arthur defended Britain from Saxon invaders in the 5th and 6th centuries AD. There are also chocolate frog cards written by Rowling that have Merlin as an advisor in King Arthur’s court.


    But the Slytherin welcome letter on Pottermore says:




    Here’s a little-known fact that the other three houses don’t bring up much: Merlin was a Slytherin. Yes, Merlin himself, the most famous wizard in history! He learned all he knew in this very house! Do you want to follow in the footsteps of Merlin?



    Since Hogwarts wasn’t founded until the 10th century AD, this seems to suggest that Arthur’s lived quite a lot later than contemporary legend.


    (Alternative explanations are that the Slytherin prefect has made this up, or Merlin lived for several centuries.)




  • The Dursleys have a car that’s about ten years too early.


    In the Order of the Phoenix film, we see their number plate quite clearly: MA06 HBH. Nominally this scene takes place in the summer of 1995.


    enter image description here



    But there are two things wrong here:



    1. The age identifier on that plate tells us it was issue in mid 2006. (See DVLA’s document on registration number formats, page 6)

    2. That’s a fifth-generation Vauxhall Astra, which wasn’t released until 2004.


    Likewise in Deathly Hallows: Part 1, they’re still driving the same, out-of-time car model, but the plate has changed:


    enter image description here


    The age identifier is now “07”, meaning a mid-2007 issue date. That is still far too new.





  • The Death Eaters attack a London that’s way out-of-place.


    In Half-Blood Prince scene with the Prime Minister, there’s a line about the destruction of the Brockdale Bridge, which must have occurred in early 1996.


    This scene is reproduced in the Half-Blood Prince, but the London it depicts doesn’t match up to the supposed timeline:




    • We see the Gherkin in a reflection, even though it wouldn’t start construction for another four years:


      enter image description here




    • They attack the Millennium Bridge, standing in for the Brockdale Bridge. But as the name implies, it wasn’t built until 2000, at the turn of the millennium.



      enter image description here






I’m sure I could go on, but I think this gets the general gist across – there are a few inconsistencies in the books, particularly when it comes to details like days of the week, but most major historical events are in line. The movies drift more significantly, as a result of them being shot significantly after the books are set.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...