Skip to main content

star trek - Why was there a death penalty for going to Talos IV?


Starfleet General Order 7 prohibits any contact with the planet Talos IV on penalty of execution, and this is apparently the only death penalty in Starfleet (at the time of The Menagerie).


But why does this particular planet justify the death penalty? The Talosians are certainly dangerous, but they don't seem to be in an entirely different league of dangerousness compared to other TOS antagonists like super espers, Balok, salt vampires, Thasians, Romulans, Trelane, etc. It's not like they've said they'll wipe out the Federation if anyone goes near their planet again. So is there any particular reason Talosians got singled out, other than plot convenience?




Answer



Talos IV is a very dangerous planet that has lots of appeal to visitors.


Prior to The Menagerie, here’s what Starfleet know about Talos IV:



  • The planet is very attractive. The Talosians were a very advanced civilisation who have been driven underground. That means lots of lost Talosian tech is sitting around for somebody to go and find.

  • The planet is very dangerous. They can control anybody who pays them a visit. That means that if they were intent on universal domination, it would be easy – as long as somebody gives them a spacecraft. They could control the occupants, and use them to infiltrate and conquer the Federation.


This gives Starfleet a headache. They need to cut off the planet, and kill anybody who has (or might have) visited. How do you do that?


An absolute death penalty is a pretty good solution. It’s a strong deterrent to visiting, and makes it easy to justify killing anybody who survives the trip.


You have to be this extreme, because softer solutions don’t work. You can’t set up a blockade, because the Talosians could capture the blockading ships. You can’t explain why Talos IV is dangerous, because plenty of people would want to capture the illusion technology for their own ends. And a ban without teeth won’t deter many people – if anything, it might make the planet more attractive.



(And Starfleet would never trust promises of benevolence, or a supposed lack of ambition. The risk of complacency is too high – if you’re complacent, and you’re wrong, then the Federation is lost.)


Most other species don’t pose the same degree of threat, or aren’t as difficult to contain. The Talosians seem to be an unusually potent and dangerous enemy.



It’s worth noting that the death penalty was later lifted. In Turnabout Intruder, we’re told that the only death penalty is General Order 4. That’s because of the events of The Menagerie, where we see that the Talosian threat is minimal.


Kirk learns that the Talosians can’t be contained by avoiding the planet. The illusory Mendez – who appears light-years away from Talos IV – serves as proof of this. Starfleet’s existing containment tactics have failed. And yet, they haven’t taken over the universe, or at least don’t appear to have done so. (Either they’re really harmless, or they’ve already won and taken over everyone and everything – in any case, there’s nothing you could do.)


The death penalty is an exceptionally unusual order, reserved for the gravest of threats. And when it no longer necessary or relevant, it’s lifted appropriately.



(It’s been years since I watched any ST: TOS, so this is based on sketchy memories and Memory Alpha. Please point out any mistakes in the comments.)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...
Post a Comment
Read more