star trek - Why couldn't the universal translator be used to communicate with the Klingons?

In Star Trek Into Darkness,

Uhura was sent alone to communicate with hostile looking Klingons on Qo'noS.

Why couldn't the universal translator be used remotely or with security personnel?

Note: the Universal Translator was invented before the new timeline diverged from the original one.

Answer

Several answers come to mind, some based in the show's mythology, others in terms of production and character development.

Klingons are no fans of technology that isn't designed to kill, maim or destroy. Using a universal translator to speak to a Klingon might be seen, by the Klingon, as a sign of disrespect. "You come to my planet illegally, run around, claiming you are hunting terrorists and you can't even explain yourself in my language? Die, alien."

Consider in the Prime Universe when Kirk and crew were being tried before being sent to Rura Penthe (Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country) they were forced to listen to their trial through a translator because the Klingons refused to speak Federation Basic. The period before the Klingons and Federation become allies is fraught with tension in either universe.

The Universal Translator is not a perfect device and subject to linguistic and nuance-based errors. Considering the nature of the relationship with the Klingons in the Abrams-verse Star Trek, someone who spoke the language would definitely be preferable to someone using the Universal Translator.

This gives Lieutenant Nyota Uhura, noted linguist (and the only person who COULD speak Klingon) an opportunity to get off the ship, get some screen time negotiating with a Klingon. When her negotiation fails, she gets some tough-girl credits for stabbing the Klingon and ending her negotiation in a style a Klingon can understand if not respect.

Comments

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...

Blog

Search This Blog