Skip to main content

harry potter - What are the limitations of healing magic?


While reading Sorcerer's Stone, I just finished the chapter where Harry walks in on Snape and Filch bandaging Snape's leg. In a previous chapter Neville falls off of his broom and we see that magic can easily heal his broken wrist. If magic can heal an injury like broken bones, why wouldn't Snape heal his leg, which was just torn up by a 3-headed dog?


My initial thought was that only certain people specialize in healing magic, but while poking around this site I came across this question: Could George's ear have been healed by Snape? This shows that Snape had at least some healing abilities. So why didn't he heal his own leg? Are there limitations that prevented Snape from healing his own wounds?



Answer



Based on the wide range of injuries shown the books, it looks as though mundane injuries are easy to heal, but injuries inflicted by magic (or highly powerful magical creatures) are more difficult and can leave permanent reminders of their presence. Neville's broken wrist was the kind of thing that could happen to Muggles, thus was easy to fix off-screen. Bill Weasley's werewolf wounds and Alastor Moody's injuries by Death Eaters, on the other hand, left permanent disfigurations.


There appears to be a correlation between the power and 'Darkness' of the magic inflicting the injury, and the difficulty of treating it. In the early books, and when students are cursing each other, the injuries are usually easily cured, as in the case of Gregory Goyle's boils and Hermione's outgrown teeth (in HPGOF). Later, we see injuries that are permanent and disfiguring, as the power of the magic used against protagonists increases in deadliness. Draco's Sectumsempra maiming by Harry Potter is an intermediate case, as it was a malific spell but was cast without understanding or deadly intent.


The bites from Fluffy, though from a magical creature, were probably healed with reasonable ease once Snape got treatment. George's ear, being removed by a powerful and malific Sectumsempra spell by Snape, would be much more difficult to heal. Snape himself, possessing some healing spells and great power, may have been able to do so (especially as he had been the one who created the spell). This is supported by the fact that he helped to heal Draco's Sectumsempra injuries in such a way as to leave him without mentionable scars. However, it is likely that he would only have been able to do so if George had kept his ear available for quick reattachment, as (again from Moody) we see that amputations appear to be permanent.


(edit) Upon reading the sources above, it seems that a body part severed by any kind of Dark magic is unrecoverable. But this raises another interesting point. The books have implied that Dark magic's power and presence, to some degree, depends on the malice of the wielder. A Crucio curse by Potter against Bellatrix Lestrange, for instance, is easily shrugged off, whereas her own Crucio is agonizing. We know that Snape willingly casts Dark spells, as when he used Avada Kedavra against Dumbledore...but the truth of his intent may not have been malicious enough to cause the full aftereffects of a Dark spell. The spell itself was Dark, however, and that may be enough for the amputation to be permanent, if only a trace is needed.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...