Skip to main content

marvel - Why do mutants get their specific powers?


There are a few sort of groups of power origins in comics: Genetic from birth (e.g. mutants, aliens), granted/endowed by external means (e.g. Spider-Man, Fantastic Four), or learned/reliant on external means (e.g. Iron Man).


In many cases of powers being granted by external means, the specific circumstances often play a major role in the new power set and abilities. Spider-Man is bitten by a radioactive spider. Sandman comes into contact with irradiated sand.


Mutants seem to be entirely different. Their powers are based on the X gene, and typically manifest at puberty or in times of great stress.


We know that at least some related mutants end up with similar or related powersets (e.g. Cyclops and Havok, or Magneto and Polaris), so biology and genetics must play at least somewhat into a mutants powers.


What determines a mutant's abilities (why did Wolverine get claws and healing, but Kitty Pryde got phasing), and when is this determination made (at birth? at time of emergence?)



Answer




In the canon Marvel Universe, there has been no way to effectively determine WHICH mutant powers a mutant may develop at puberty. Even if a mutant has a parent who has mutant or superhuman potential which has been realized, the offspring may or may not have related superhuman abilities.


There are scientists who have made it their life's work to study the phenomenon of mutant development (Charles Xavier, Moira McTaggart and Hank McCoy) and as yet still have no true understanding of how the X-gene or its related mutant powers function, though some of the more extreme factions have exploited their limited understanding to great effect including En Sabah Nur (Apocalypse), Nathaniel Essex (Mister Sinister) and the Dark Beast (Hank McCoy from a parallel reality, Earth-295).


enter image description here




  • Mutant powers in the Marvel Universe are not natural abilities. They are not the result of evolutionary mutation as we understand it in our universe. Human and animal evolution on Earth are the result of slow mutations which enhance our species potential for survival on Earth.




  • Mutant powers are not the result of environmental pressures causing mutation to take place to help species survival. Mutant abilities are the result of artificial tampering with the Human genome and the inclusion of genetic patents which in certain undisclosed combinations lead to mental/psychic/physical transformations which imbue their recipient with abilities far beyond the Human norm.





  • Bestowing particular mutant abilities is still beyond the realm of most scientists in the Marvel Universe: While this X-factor has been designated the X-gene, very few mutants, scientists or metahumans have ever been successful in controlling these X-genetic factors. One of the only mutants to ever harness such powers successfully is Apocalypse. These mutants are often dubbed The Horsemen of Apocalypse.




enter image description here


Warren Worthington/Archangel as the Horseman, Death, after his transformation by Apocalypse




  • The Horsemen traditionally take the titles of Death, Famine, War, and Pestilence. During their conversions Apocalypse usually augments their powers and/or outfits them with specially designed weapons and equipment using his advanced technology.





enter image description here


Eson the Searcher and other unknown Celestials.



  • As to secondary mutation: Despite the tongue-in-cheek perspective on mutants who experience secondary mutation, most times, it is unknown what possible abilities will represent there either. As far as humanity is concerned, our ability to predict what mutations will take place is fairly rare even when family lines have been documented.


See Also: Is there a set limit on mutant abilities, where they're deemed too unrealistic?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...