Skip to main content

star trek - Are the similarities between TOS:The Changeling and ST:The Motion Picture coincidental?


The original Star Trek series episode TOS2x08: The Changeling features an old Earth probe that was presumed lost, returns and on its way to discover its point of origin sterilizes planets it find to be imperfect. Kirk is even called "the Creator".


Star Trek: The Motion Picture features an old Earth probe, presumed lost, that returns to Earth to find its Creator. Along its way it scans and destroys all carbon based life.


Are these similarities just a coincidence or was The Motion Picture in some way based on this episode?



Answer



It really depends on how you define coincidence. (This is long, since it involves background from several aspects of Star Trek -- but I provide links to some cool behind the scenes books, including one that has copies of two never-produced scripts for a Star Trek show that almost was and the other has the original draft of Harlan Ellison's The City on the Edge of Forever.)


Gene Roddenberry had some specific tastes, and one was the indestructible foe. This shows up in many storylines throughout Trekdom, at least as long as Roddenberry was alive. We see a taste of it in The Cage, where Captain Pike comes up against the Talosians, and again in the next pilot, in Samual Peeple's script for Where No Man Has Gone Before, but those antagonists are people, with many ways to defeat them.



Better examples would be the large ship in The Corbomite Maneuver, The Squire of Gothos, Landru (who was really a computer) in Return of the Archons, The Changeling, Vaal, in The Apple, and The Doomsday Machine. (This is where I stopped looking, but I suspect you won't find many in TOS, Season 3, since Roddenberry wasn't Exec Producer at that point, due to NBC calling him out on what he hoped was just a bluff.)


This theme also re-appears in Star Trek: The Next Generation in the form of Q. Even after Roddenberry was not as active in the show (old and not in great shape, from what I hear), we see the Borg show up in Q Who.


Roddenberry liked godlike beings that seemed unstoppable and notice that if this being or entity was something that could be communicated with, it was usually defeated by Kirk having a logic argument and creating some kind of infinite loop (we also see this in I, Mudd). This doesn't happen in every one, for instance, there's no way to communicate with the planet killer in The Doomsday Machine. Of course, later, it was Picard, and he essentially did "out logic" Q to a point in the courtroom scenes and did something similar in Q Who by doing what Q did not expect and admitting he wasn't able to defeat the Borg.


Roddenberry had this big issue with a need for big, heavy, and severe danger. Harlan Ellison commented on this when he referred to his experience in writing City on the Edge of Forever, in his book The City on the Edge of Forever. He comments that Roddenberry would call him and say, "The ship has to be in danger. BIG danger!" (He also said Roddenberry would blame that on the network and that a good story wasn't enough -- the Enterprise had to be seriously threatened.)


(The link is to a copy of that book on Amazon. I recommend the book, since it gives an interesting view of Ellison's experience as well as the original draft of the script for The City on the Edge of Forever.)


Roddenberry had a need to make the viewers feel a serious threat - he loved it and used the godlike being or the unstoppable, indestructible foe many times. (Yes, often this makes for a good story -- pitting the protagonists against an antagonist stronger than they are, but you can only recycle a plot but so many times.)


Now, to get the rest of this, it helps to know about the Star Trek show that almost was: Star Trek: Phase II. In the 1970s, due to the rising popularity of a show everyone expected to just disappear, Paramount was interested in launching a new Star Trek series. So they started work for Star Trek: Phase II. This series would feature the original cast, other than Leonard Nimoy, and included three new characters: Xon, a Vulcan (who would essentially replace Spock), Ilia, the ship's Counselor, and Stephen Decker (who was supposedly the son of Matt Decker, who died in The Doomsday Machine) as the ship's XO, who would be the new hero who would go on landing parties instead of Kirk.


You can find out a lot of fascinating details about this in Star Trek: Phase II, The Lost Series. It's an amazing look at how the series almost was, then wasn't. They had story outlines and even scripts ready for a new series.


But along the way, another show from the 1960s (sorry, I can't remember which one) ended up as a movie and actually did well at the box office. So Paramount decided that it'd be even better to make a movie, instead of a TV series. A good movie would bring in big bucks and after the movie was done, they could either make sequels or go for a TV show.


The 2 hour pilot for Star Trek: Phase II (written by Alan Dean Foster) was another great example of Roddenberry's craving for godlike beings, right down to the title (In Thy Image). While there's nothing in the book to indicate that the intent was to clone The Changeling from the original series, considering Roddenberry's love of godlike beings, and his feeling that they were great drama, it makes sense that for a series pilot, he'd want to kick off with that kind of concept.



When the change was made to make a movie instead of a TV series, for some reason (I don't know production timing -- they could have been in a hurry), they just grabbed the 2 hour script In Thy Image and re-wrote it to include Spock (and Xon was essentially written down to one brief scene with Kirk and one scene where he died in a transporter accident -- and was later just left on the cutting room floor.) Ilia was changed to the ship's navigator, since introducing a new role that would be hard to explain in a few lines did not make sense for a 2 hour movie. And then they added hours of special effects scenes to make it feel more "big screen-ish."


You can read the original 2 hour script for In Thy Image in the book I liked to above, along with the script for The Child (later made into a ST:TNG episode), and story outlines for a number of other episodes (at least one other also became an episode in ST:TNG and one story included what may be a precursor to the idea of the Borg).


The intent was to stick with what Roddenberry thought would be the strongest concept for a series pilot. He liked godlike beings, so he picked one for the pilot for STPII and when they changed it to a movie, they just stuck with that script. So you can call it coincidence, but it's more just because Roddenberry liked that concept.


(Trek fans may want to watch ST:TMP on a small screen sometime and notice it plays better on TV than it did on a big screen when it seemed empty. That's because it was originally written for TV and was never given a proper re-write when it was re-purposed for the big screen.)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.