Skip to main content

star wars - Droid Memory Wipe


So in various stages of the books and movies, droid memory wipes are mentioned. This made me wonder why didn't the Jawa's wipe the memory of R2D2 and C3PO before they sold them? I would think it would be standard practice to prevent the exact issue that arouse that droids go off on their own because of the programming left by their former masters. Especially since they 'scavanged' the droids. If they bought them from a reputable dealer to resell, then that is different, but they technically stole them or at least didn't care who their owner was. One would think that to cover your tracks, you would wipe their memory before selling them.




Answer



Droid memory wipes are established in The New Rebellion as only affecting a droid's personal memories, not their hardwired memories. I'll paraphrase from memory here, as I don't have the book with me:



Security Droid: "When you get a memory wipe, do you need to re-learn all 6 million forms of communication?"


C-3PO: "Of course not, that's hard-wired in."



To use an analogy; when a human gets amnesia, they may forget who their spouse, parents and children are, but they usually remember their skills. A painter may not remember any of their paintings, but they will still remember how to paint. We don't actually know why this occurs, but I'm not a neurologist, I just need an example.


Droids in the Star Wars universe are also shown to be able to 'download' (my word) knowledge and skills which would be unaffected by memory wipes. Again in The New Rebellion, C-3PO passes the time when he's "bored" (that word is actually in the book, though I think Threepio is denying that he's bored) by downloading new languages into his hard-wired memory; this process is shown taking less time than a human learning a new language, but more than simply pressing a button and gaining instantaneous knowledge. It seems akin to the skill downloads in The Matrix.


That answers the question of what a memory-wipe actually entails. As to why the Jawas don't perform a memory-wipe, it is never actually stated in either the film or the novelisation. I don't recall even noticing it mentioned in any EU material either. My supposition would be that memory-wipes on droids require equipment that the Jawas, technological scavengers, simply don't have. We know the Lars family does not have the capacity to wipe droids' memories; they need to visit the nearby town of Anchorhead to do so.


C-3PO's memory is wiped in Revenge of the Sith, but that was a consular ship; a spaceship is likely far larger than a Jawa sand-crawler, with better technology, and a diplomatic vessel is itself quite likely to have specialised software and hardwire onboard for dealing with protocol and translation droids. This is a possible explanation of why they don't also wipe R2-D2's memory; the ship isn't set-up to deal with astromechs in the same way as it is protocol droids.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...