Skip to main content

story identification - Scientists accidentally breed super-intelligent mice


This one is really nagging me. The plot goes something like this:


Two scientists, one from the U.S., one newly escaped from the Soviet Union, have a polite argument about evolution. The former Russian scientist makes a passionate case that, while most of Soviet biology is nonsense, there is some truth to the theories of Lamarck and Lysenko, that acquired traits can be inherited.


They agree to a bet and an experiment to prove or disprove his assertion. A giant, constantly shifting maze of tubes, traps and feeding stations is built. Mousy routes to safety and food, once learned, change on a daily or hourly basis.


many details forgotten here . . .


The scientists take careful note of the success rate of their mice. Several mouse generations pass. One day there is some sort of equipment failure, perhaps a fire, that sets free the test subjects. The scientists stand outside their wrecked lab and dolefully confer. The Soviet scientist reluctantly agrees that there has been no evidence that Lysenko was right. The current crop of mice is no more evolved, no more intelligent that the original generation.


Hidden off to the side, two scientist mice take careful notes, happily agreeing that nothing has changed and saying that now they can get rid of their troublesome telepathic mice.


I probably have a number of the details wrong, but the overall feel of the story should be correct.


I have no idea of the age of the original story. I would date it anywhere from the 1940s to the 1960s. It does have a Golden Age feel to it, rather than New Wave. I must have read it in an anthology, perhaps in the 1980s.



I have the feeling someone out there will recognize this in a heartbeat. At least, I'm hoping so.


One thing I need to add, this was a humorous story and not serious at all. No horror or Frankenstein elements.



Answer



"The Lysenko Maze", a short story by Donald A. Wollheim (alias "David Grinnell"), originally published in Punch, 30 December 1953. You might have read it in the 1987 Asimov–Greenberg anthology The Great SF Stories #16 (1954). The extracts below are quoted from The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, July 1954, available at the Internet Archive.


The former Russian scientist makes a passionate case that, while most of Soviet biology is nonsense, there is some truth to the theories of Lamarck and Lysenko, that acquired traits can be inherited.



The professor waved his hands wildly, a little upset at disturbing his newfound friends. "But of course I am not a Communist — do I have to tell you this again? Do I have to show you what I have gone through? Am I not the same man I was an hour ago, yesterday, last month? A good biologist, a good believer in democracy, in freedom of speech and conscience? Da! I am all that — and yet I tell you again, Lysenko is right!"



They agree to a bet and an experiment to prove or disprove his assertion.


I don't see anything about a monetary stake, but they agree to an experiment:




"If," and Raine weighed his words carefully, "you have seen proof that Lysenko's theories of evolution and the heredity of acquired characteristics do work, would you be willing to conduct an experiment here — under our conditions — to prove it again?"



A giant, constantly shifting maze of tubes, traps and feeding stations is built. Mousy routes to safety and food, once learned, change on a daily or hourly basis.



"At first the mice will become confused, for to obtain water they must come to one place, salt another, meat a third, fruit a fourth, and so on. And within the lifetime of each mouse the will see the regular alternation of these places. They will have to learn to determine the next day's alternation in advance, for there will never be enough food for all. As this goes on, as future generations come into existence, new problems will be added, dangers will be placed in the tubes. These mice will have to force themselves to acquire greater and greater skill at solving problems or die out."



The scientists take careful note of the success rate of their mice. Several mouse generations pass. One day there is some sort of equipment failure, perhaps a fire, that sets free the test subjects.



Now the lights flickered again, there was a crackling sound, sparks leaped through the air, and the tube fell apart at the point! The men leaped to their feet as a horde of little beasts poured through. There was a smell of smoke, and as the two men rushed into the outside darkness, they saw that the farmhouse was ablaze.




The scientists stand outside their wrecked lab and dolefully confer. The Soviet scientist reluctantly agrees that there has been no evidence that Lysenko was right. The current crop of mice is no more evolved, no more intelligent that the original generation.



They stood on a knoll watching the building, its records, and the intricate Lysenko maze burning to ashes. Raine grasped Borisov's arm. "You failed. The Lysenko experiment was a failure. It was that blue mouse, you know. And do you know what that blue mouse was?"

The Russian stared at the fire. "It was certainly intelligent. It certainly had contrived a short-circuit, it managed to get all the mice to unite in breaking out. So it was intelligent, and its intelligence came out of the experiment."

"That mouse," shouted Raine triumphantly, "that mouse was not like the others! It was a mutation, a 'supermouse,' a mutant freak with no relation to its ancestors nor to this foolish experiment!"

"Da, da," said the Russian, shaking his head. "I see your point. It makes sense. Those other mice, I have seen them too often. They hadn't changed, they were just gray mice who spread all over the tube confusing all our clever rotations." He sighed deeply.

"Heredity," said Raine, standing in the darkness watching the house burn, "cannot be changed by acquired characteristics. The only mouse that varied, that was above the norm in any way, was simply a freak of nature, an accident of the chromosomes, a mutant, and, one that, thank heavens, was probably sterile, since we saw no other bluish mice turning up."



Hidden off to the side, two scientist mice take careful notes, happily agreeing that nothing has changed and saying that now they can get rid of their troublesome telepathic mice.



Borisov nodded his head sadly. And sitting on the branches of a bush, in close proximity and a little behind him, three gray mice nodded their heads in agreement. Their prehensile fingers, curled around little bits of sharpened nutshells, carefully noted on scrolls of dried skin what their thought-wave-sensitive brains had just picked up. It was good to know that their opinion of their eccentric blue brother with the dictator complex was verified by the Outside Thinkers. Now they could dispose of his troublesome body in peace and get to work in the real wide world.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...