Skip to main content

star wars - Did Barriss fall to the Dark Side?


After reading This question, I wondered if Barriss fell to the Dark Side in order to frame Ahsoka Tano. In order to do it, she force-choked the witness from a far away distance, which is something we have only watched powerful Dark Side users like Sidious and Vader perform, and at the time she was only a Padawan.


This question lists her among the Jedi who fell to the Dark Side during the Clone Wars, but I don't remember if it was clearly stated by anybody in the council.


So, pretty straight forward. Was it stated anywhere that Barriss fell to the Dark Side? Or did was she just disappointed by the Jedi's actions during the war?



Answer



At first I too thought that Bariss had fallen to the dark side, but upon further investigation I believe it is at best inconclusive to say anything about the matter. Let's look at her actions.



Actions part 1: She Force-choked a suspect, fought with red lightsabers etc.


Those lightsabers were stolen from Ventress to frame Ahsoka earlier, and she hid them away. She used them only because they were conveniently within reach and useful for attempting to flee the Temple now that it appears she had been discovered and Anakin has her original lightsaber.


Force choke does not appear to be an exclusively dark side power, contrary to popular belief. It is merely using telekinesis - a basic neutral ability - to push in on all sides of a target's neck. Jedi such as Luke Skywalker had been known to use it as well, although usually but not restricted to non-lethal effect. So using Force choke isn't evidence of falling to the dark side either.


Actions part 2: She attacked the Jedi, isn't that because she has fallen to the dark side?


That's not a sound argument. Mandalorians had attacked the Jedi Temple in the past, and they can hardly be called dark siders. More to the point, Bariss had this to say while on trial:



"I did it. Because I've come to realize what many people in the Republic have come to realize, that the Jedi are the ones responsible for this War. That we've so lost our way that we have become villains in this conflict, that we are the ones that should be put on trial, all of us! And my attack on the Temple was an attack on what the Jedi have become: an army fighting for the dark side, fallen from the Light that we once held so dear. This Republic is failing! It's only a matter of time."



This seems to suggest that Bariss merely had twisted (or correct?) beliefs of reality and justice, and all this time she had merely been serving the light side in what she believed is the right way.


Falling to the dark side generally means allowing her emotions to rule her actions fully, especially in fear and anger, as opposed to complete discipline and control etc. as the light side instructs. Personal quest for ultimate power vs. selfless pursuit of what is right. Did this happen to Bariss? Nothing was decisively mentioned in this regard. The bombing of the Temple, the killing of the witness and the framing of Ahsoka are elaborate plots to combat what she believes is an order fallen to darkness, and her clash with Anakin is more survival than anything else, imo. Perhaps her fate after the trial sheds more light: After the events of the bombing, she appeared to have remained in the order, eventually taking a Padawan of her own and heading to Felucia on a mission before falling to Order 66. This suggests that she had either been perceived as misguided as opposed to fallen, or she had been turned back to the light. However, the source for this is unconfirmed Legends, and may very well be non-canon, so ultimately we've nothing conclusive about Bariss to judge her on.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...