Skip to main content

comics - Why was Superman made practically physically invulnerable?


Everyone knows Superman is physically invulnerable to pretty much anything except kryptonite. To my mind, this makes for a fairly dull superhero because it takes a lot of danger out of the comic. I was wondering if Jerry Seigel or anyone involved with Superman had explained why they made this decision?



Answer



Superman was, and even to this day, never completely invulnerable. His powers when he first became a character in the newspapers back in 1939 were:



  • Leaping one-eight of a mile

  • Nothing less than a bursting shell could penetrate his skin

  • Strong enough to lift an automobile of the time, cleanly over his head

  • he had no superhuman visions, senses or ranged abilities



While this was sufficient for the comic for a while, it became a problem for the Superman when he became a radio play character and even more so when he became animated during the early 1940s. The Fleischer & Famous Superman animated shorts are some of the finest cartoons of the period. During this time, Superman became a bit stronger and a bit faster.



  • He became strong enough to lift giant robots

  • He became fast enough to race locomotives

  • He didn't quite fly, but could leap long distances and it looked like flying...


During this time, superheroes were beginning to gain traction and Superman was experiencing competition. So he became a bit flashier to keep up.


During the fifties, the Superman family expanded adding Krypto, Supergirl and Mon-el. At this point Superman's powers began to expand:




  • adding a range of sensory abilities, super-hearing, x-ray vision, telescopic vision

  • also started using his x-ray vision as a weapon eventually becoming "heat vision"

  • his strength became significantly greater in the fifties, keeping him the biggest dog on the superhero landscape which had begun to grow.

  • He began using his cape as a tool, since it was also invulnerable, as everything from Krypton was, he could use it to contain explosions, protect humans from superhuman speed flight and he used it to keep people warm on the way to his Fortress of Solitude in the Arctic.


The release of the book, Seduction of the Innocent, in the 1950's which blamed comics for social ills threw cold water on the comic industry. Four-color heroes had taken a turn for the worse and Westerns were the only things selling well during the period.


By the sixties and seventies, comics exploded with DC Comics, Charlton and Marvel Comics, producing an entirely new line of comics. This is when Superman's powers simply became far to numerous to keep track of. He acquired new powers as plot devices, sometimes lasting only one issue, experimentation with new conditions (like humans gaining powers under blue suns) and the multiple colors of Kryptonite made this one of the most prolific periods of power amplification of the Superman Family.



  • Super-hypnotism - he could mesmerize people simply by looking at them and talking to them. It was explained this was how people never notice he and Clark Kent never seem to question their similarity because this power (amplified by his wearing glasses) would make him appear weak and frailer than he was.)

  • Extreme Superhuman strength - powerful enough to move small planets, during the seventies, there was NO hero in the DC Universe with more strength than Superman.


  • Superbreath - the power to extinguish large fires with an explosive expulsion of breath, or to freeze objects with his super-COLD breath

  • Nearly complete invulnerability to everything. Only magic, exotic radiations or an orange or red sun could even slow him down.


This continual expansion of powers of superheroes, plus their numerous parallel Earths lead to the eventual dissolution of the DC Multiverse in the Crisis on Infinite Earths, where the entire DC Universe was restructured, power levels changed, redundant characters removed and most importantly Superman was depowered.


As Post-Crisis Superman, written by John Byrne's in a series called The Man of Steel, Superman was returned to a more functional scale (as well as the rest of the DC Universe being rebalanced, for a time) and his powers were scaled back from his 1970-1980 Cosmic levels. (As a note, the character Supreme has the same or even greater levels of power than Pre-Crisis Superman.)


This recalibration allowed writers to create stories for Superman that did not require him to move planets to tell stories.



  • He lost his complete invulnerability. He was still tough, but a nuclear weapon was again able to affect him.

  • Byrne tried to create more reasonable pseudo-scientific reasons for his powers.

  • Byrne introduced the skin-tight force-field concept meaning his suits would rarely be damaged in a fight, but he lost capes like crazy.


  • Byrne's Superman was very human and took a beat-down like a man.

  • But this Superman was less popular and slowly but surely became more powerful.

  • For a time, Superman's powers suite changed completely (after the world-famous Death of Superman storyline) he had powers that were based in electricity. He was commonly called Electric Superman. And for a time, there were even two of him. Superman Red and Superman Blue.


To sum it up, Superman persists because writers have been forced to adapt and change the character with the times. Sometimes it works, sometimes it fails. His plethora of powers, identities, friends and family have made him the most recognized icon on Earth. His invulnerability, may come and go, but his iconic nature is what makes him legendary.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...