Skip to main content

doctor who - How many hearts does River Song have?


River Song is quoted by The Doctor as "Half Time Lord". She is also called daughter of the TARDIS despite the fact that she was actually born from human parents. Probably, it's a Wibbly-Wobbly stuff because the parents mated inside the TARDIS.


River Song can regenerate which shows a property of a Time Lord, but how many hearts does she have? One (number of human hearts) or two (number of Time Lord hearts) or average of both i.e. 1.5 (AFAIK, hearts can only exist in integers but it's Timey-Wimey stuff, so maybe it has partial quantum superposition or something similar)?



Answer



To the best of my knowledge no on-screen statement has been made conclusively either way, and Doctor Who 'canon' only exists inasmuch as sometimes it doesn't actively contradict itself. But we can extrapolate that the most likely scenario is:


River Song should have one heart.


She's a human, not a Gallifreyan, and that makes all the difference. Being a Time Lord shouldn't have any impact on gross biology like the quantity of one's organs, because "Time Lord" is not a race, nor a species. It just means you've been subjected to a suite of (poorly-defined) biotechnological enhancements invented by Gallifreyans--and almost always only used on Gallifreyans, so Time Lords have two hearts because Time Lords are almost exclusively Gallifreyan, not because being a Time Lord does that to you. (See the Doctor's daughter, who seems to probably be a Gallifreyan and not a Time Lord but had two hearts anyway.)


River Song is a human, born of human parents, who has "Time Lord DNA" upgrades/enhancement/modifications from TARDIS/Time Vortex technobabble [waves hand vigorously]. She's displayed Time Lord features like regeneration because of this (but there are many indications she didn't get the full suite of enhancements). There's no reason, however, that she should have two hearts: that seems to be a quirk of Gallifreyan anatomy and River Song is not Gallifreyan.


The idea of human Time Lords, by the way, is not new.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...