Skip to main content

the lord of the rings - Could Gandalf have killed the Witch-king?


There was a prophecy about the Witch-king of Angmar saying that 'No man could kill him'.


The actual quote:



"He will not return to this land. Far off yet is his doom, and not by the hand of a man will he fall." —Glorfindel, The Return of the King, Appendix A (iv)




I always interpreted it as literary speak for no person of the male gender could kill him, which is why Eowyn was able to deal the death blow after Merry broke the spell granting them undying life.


But while answering this question, NominSim pointed out rightly that it is possible to interpret the prophecy as no male human can kill him and since Gandalf was a maiar, he could have definitely defeated the Witch King.


Is there anything in canon to clear this up?



Answer



The quote you are looking for is:



...if words spoken of old be true, not by the hand of man shall he fall, and hidden from the Wise is the doom that awaits him. However that may be, the Captain of Despair does not press forward, yet. He rules rather according to the wisdom that you have just spoken, from the rear, driving his slaves in madness on before.



My Answer:


It seems that Gandalf at least has enough confidence in his abilities to fight the Witch King one on one. The "prophecy" itself is fairly vague, and there are numerous examples of "man" in the book referring both to a "male" and to "someone who is of man kind". It is difficult to say with certainty that the prophecy could or couldn't have been fulfilled by Gandalf, but my inclination is to believe that it could have been.



Edit: Note too that the words are "the hand of man" and not "the hand of a man". Man when used in the first sense usually refers to mankind.


Gandalf is a Maia, so not a "man", and was sent to Middle Earth to fight Sauron. The wizards were prevented from matching their power with Sauron directly, but it is indicated that they could have fought Sauron themselves. Someone who could do that should have the power to destroy the Witch King, Sauron's agent and lesser.


Additionally there are "prophesies" that do not come true in the books as well, so to set much store in them isn't necessarily wise. (For example Theoden says, much like this prophecy; "no living man shall pass" the Paths of the Dead, yet Aragorn disproves that).


Finally, the prophecy states that "not by the hand of man shall he fall", which to me indicates that it is a foregone conclusion how the Witch King shall fall. It seems different from "no man can kill him" in that it doesn't state that it isn't possible, just that that isn't how it will happen. Kind of like saying; "I shall drive my car home now". I could walk, but that isn't going to happen.


Note: Everything below here is simply evidence for my summary above.


Here is a quote indicating Gandalf believes that he can fight the Witch King:



In rode the Lord of the Nazgûl. A great black shape against the fires beyond he loomed up, grown to a vast menace of despair. In rode the Lord of the Nazgûl, under the archway that no enemy ever yet had passed, and all fled before his face. All save one. There waiting, silent and still in the space before the Gate, sat Gandalf upon Shadowfax: Shadowfax who alone among the free horses of the earth endured the terror, unmoving, steadfast as a graven image in Rath Dínen. 'You cannot enter here,' said Gandalf, and the huge shadow halted. 'Go back to the abyss prepared for you! Go back! Fall into the nothingness that awaits you and your Master. Go!'



The Rohirrim arrive before any battle can take place however, and the Witch King "...left the Gate and vanished." Gandalf then means to follow/hinder him:




Gandalf looked through the gaping Gate, and already on the fields he heard the gathering sound of battle. He clenched his hand. 'I must go,' he said. 'The Black Rider is abroad, and he will yet bring ruin on us. I have no time.'



but Pippin asks him if he can save Faramir from his father, to which he responds:



'Maybe I can,' said Gandalf, 'but if I do, then others will die, I fear. Well, I must come, since no other help can reach him. But evil and sorrow will come of this. Even in the heart of our stronghold the Enemy has power to strike us: for his will it is that is at work.'



It seems that Gandalf realizes that he is needed on the battlefield, and his fears are realized when Theoden dies. Gandalf certainly felt that he could help, whether it be by killing the Witch King or by driving him off it is uncertain.


Further evidence to Gandalf's apparent ability to match the Witch King in a battle: (emphasis mine)




'Yet now under the Lord of Barad-dur the most fell of all his captains is already master of your outer walls,' said Gandalf. 'King of Angmar long ago, Sorcerer, Ringwraith, Lord of the Nazgûl, a spear of terror in the hand of Sauron, shadow of despair.'


'Then, Mithrandir, you had a foe to match you,' said Denethor. 'For myself, I have long known who is the chief captain of the hosts of the Dark Tower. Is this all that you have returned to say? Or can it be that you have withdrawn because you are overmatched?'



To which Gandalf responds



'It might be so,' Gandalf answered softly. 'But our trial of strength is not yet come...'



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...
Post a Comment
Read more