Skip to main content

star trek - Why is the Federation so poorly patrolled?


After reading this answer to the question Roughly how many starships are in Starfleet? I was left with the question of: why is the Enterpise so frequently "the only ship in range" whenever something awful happens? This would seem to indicate that the Federation is not very good at managing its resources.



Answer



Here's one way to think about it: based on the maps shown in Can anyone explain the Star Trek astrography (i.e. quadrants)?, you can estimate the size of the region of space explored by the Federation and its allies. The map shows that they appear to have a reach of about 15000 LY across, end-to-end, but that's not a circular region, so it's probably more realistic to approximate the cross-sectional area of explored space shown in the map at about 100 million square light years (10000x10000). Now, the galactic disk is a few thousand light years thick, depending on which definition you use. I would estimate that the Federation has probably explored the central 2500 LY or so.1 So the volume of explored space is probably roughly approximated by a cylinder 10000 LY in diameter and 2500 LY high, which would have a volume of about 200 billion cubic light years.


Now, in Roughly how many starships are in Starfleet?, it was estimated that there are about 30000 Federation-aligned ships among Starfleet and its allies. But presumably Starfleet can only send its own ships to investigate things, so the number of ships that can meaningfully be considered in range for something is lower. Even with an optimistic estimate of 10000 actual Starfleet ships, if you spread those 10000 starships over the supposed volume of explored space, that's one ship per 20 million cubic light years. Anything in that 20 million cubic light year space has to be handled by the one ship. And realistically, even if the Enterprise isn't the closest ship, there's a decent chance that the actual closest ship is already occupied doing something else.


You can get a rough estimate of the average distance between ships by taking the cube root of that 20 million LY^3 volume: it works out to about 270 light years. According to HorusKol's comment on this answer, warp 9.6 is about 10 LY per day, which means it would take about a month at even that high warp factor for one Starfleet vessel to rendevouz with another, on average.



Something else you might consider, though, is that Starfleet ships probably spend more of their time on the borders of Federation space than zipping around through the middle of it, because interesting things in the middle of the Federation have probably already been discovered. By the same token, the top and bottom of the cylinder are not likely to be that interesting because the density of stars gets so low. So you could do an alternate calculation of how Starfleet ships would distributed across the border area of Federation space. Considering only the "side" of the cylinder I mentioned before, it has an area of 80 million square light years. Let's say half of Starfleet is assigned to border patrol and exploration, on average, so you have 5000 ships covering that area. That corresponds to one ship per ~16000 square light years, for an average distance between ships on the border of 125 LY.




1The galactic disk doesn't have a definite thickness because the star density gradually decreases as you move away from the galactic plane. Carroll and Ostlie's Modern Astrophysics gives a number density of


n(z,R) = n_0(exp(-z/z_thin) + 0.02exp(-z/z_thick))exp(-R/h_R)


(p.919, first edition, 1996). This is a superposition of two profiles, the thin disk and the thick disk, with the characteristic length scales zthin = 325pc = 1059 LY and zthick = 1.4kpc = 4500LY. My estimate of 2500 LY comes from guessing that the Federation would consider it worth exploring out to the point where the stellar density drops to roughly 10% of its value in the galactic plane.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...