Skip to main content

Different effect of Harry's Cruciatus curse at Ministry Skirmish vs Battle of Hogwarts?


In HP & the Order of the Phoenix, Harry chased Bellatrix Lestrange after she murdered Sirius Black. He used cruciatus curse on her but it was not really effective.


As Bellatrix said:



"You need to mean them, Potter! You need to really want to cause pain... to enjoy it... righteous anger won't hurt me for long... I'll show you how it is done, shall I? I'll give you a lesson —"



Later when Amycus Carrow spat on Minerva McGonagall, Harry used the curse splendidly.



As Amycus spun around, Harry shouted, "Crucio!"



The Death Eater was lifted off his feet. He writhed through the air like a drowning man, thrashing and howling in pain, and then, with a crunch and a shattering of glass, he smashed into the front of a bookcase and crumpled, insensible, to the floor. "I see what Bellatrix meant," said Harry, the blood thundering through his brain, "you need to really mean it."



Harry Potter Wikia attributes this to lack of sadistic feeling in Harry.


But still it makes no sense. Harry should have had more desire to cause pain after murder of his godfather but he was only able to knock Bellatrix off her feet. Wikia however also suggests that Bellatrix was probably less affected by the curse due to her lack of conscience and being a sadistic person herself but somehow I don't feel it's quite right.


Only rational explanation that I have been able to give myself is that the war-time environment changed Harry Potter from a young boy he was in HPTOOTP to a grizzled veteran by the time of Battle of Hogwarts & somehow his sense of emotions was also affected by it.


Could it be that Harry liked McGonagall better than Sirius and thus was able to channel his anger better than he did in Ministry skirmish? Is there any better explanation?



Answer



I think you basically answered your own question. It's not about who he cared for more, it's about his emotional state. When Harry attacks Bellatrix, he's fifteen, angry, scared and shocked. He's an emotional wreck.



"SHE KILLED SIRIUS!" bellowed Harry. "SHE KILLED HIM I’LL KILL HER!"




Later



"Aaaaaah... did you love him, little baby Potter?"


Hatred rose in Harry such as he had never known before; he flung himself out from behind the fountain and bellowed, "Crucio!"



The reason his spell doesn't work is exactly as Bellatrix says - you have to mean it. Harry can't truly mean it in this state, he's too confused, too upset, and at that age, too good to enjoy someone else's pain the way the Bellatrix could. He tries because of righteous anger, not because he would truly enjoy Bellatrix's pain.


Compare this with when he attacks Carrow.



Harry pulled the Cloak off himself, raised his wand, and said, "You shouldn't have done that."



As Amycus spun around, Harry shouted, "Crucio!"



This is far calmer, almost premeditated. He's cool enough to deliver a line, and cool enough to control his own actions. He chose to hurt Carrows, not just out of righteous anger, not out of impulse, but because he wanted to see him suffer.


It's the difference between temporary insanity and premeditated crime. It's not more passion that makes it worse, it's less.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...