While I think the Star Trek (2009) movie was pretty cool looking, its story-line wreaks total havoc with all the existing post original series content.
I know that Gene Roddenberry was very strict about what was considered canon in the past, basically anything he didn't like well (like the animated series). But now, since his death, it seems like all the later series are considered canon.
Is the latest Star Trek (2009) considered canon?
Answer
Since the events of the 2009 movie take place in an alternate timeline to that of the original series, there is no logical problem with it being canon.
The hows and whys are detailed here: Bob Orci Explains How The New Star Trek Movie Fits With Trek Canon (and Real Science)
Comments
Post a Comment