Skip to main content

harry potter - How does the diary prove Voldemort is the Heir of Slytherin?



Harry: "The diary wasn't that special."
Dumbledore: "The diary, as you have said yourself, was proof that he was the Heir of Slytherin; I am sure that Voldemort considered it of stupendous importance."


Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 23: Horcruxes (slightly more than halfway through)



How does the diary prove that? Sure, it contains a fragment of his soul which can come out and open the chamber, but wouldn't the same be true of any other Horcrux, as well as by Voldemort being able to do it himself? How does the diary lend any additional credence to the claim?



Every other Horcrux was a rare magical item with a long history, but the diary was . . . just a diary. As far as I know the books don't even make it clear where it came from or how Voldemort got it. It was an ordinary notebook. So Dumbledore's argument for why it was chosen, instead of something more special, makes little sense. How is it different from any other object he might have chosen, like a pencil sharpener or a can of WD-40?



Answer



Riddle probably wrote in it


The original quote from Chamber of Secrets might seem to imply that Voldemort made the diary into a Horcrux for the express purpose of opening the Chamber.



"Well, he certainly kept an annoyingly close watch on me after Hagrid was expelled,” said Riddle carelessly. “I knew it wouldn’t be safe to open the Chamber again while I was still at school. But I wasn’t going to waste those long years I’d spent searching for it. I decided to leave behind a diary, preserving my sixteen-year-old self in its pages, so that one day, with luck, I would be able to lead another in my footsteps, and finish Salazar Slytherin’s noble work.”


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



This may be. However, Voldemort may have purchased the diary before opening the Chamber in his fifth year:




Harry saw at once that it was a diary, and the faded year on the cover told him it was fifty years old. He opened it eagerly.


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



This does not mean that it was literally fifty years old, merely approximately so. In any case, even if he purchased it the year he opened the Chamber, he may still have written in it.


Indeed, Harry explicitly says that Riddle wrote the diary:



“It was this diary,” said Harry quickly, picking it up and showing it to Dumbledore. “Riddle wrote it when he was sixteen. . . .


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



The purpose of the diary was ultimately to open the Chamber once more:




"Well, he didn't want his hard work to be wasted," said Harry. "He wanted people to know he was Slytherin's heir, because he couldn't take credit at the time."


Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince



It is this statement that Dumbledore references when he says that the diary proved that Riddle was Slytherin's heir. Nonetheless, I suspect Riddle originally wrote in the diary about his opening the Chamber of Secrets: it is the only interpretation that makes sense.


It seems most likely that Riddle wrote in his diary the details of how he had opened the Chamber. Thus, the diary proved that Riddle had opened the Chamber before he made it into a Horcrux. After he made it into a Horcrux, the piece of soul inside could control the ink in its pages (and thus presumably kept the account hidden).


Alternately, perhaps Riddle made the diary precisely because he needed a Horcrux that could communicate with people directly, which the diary could do by means of the ink spilled on its pages (whereas presumably the diadem could not). As such, proving that he was the Heir of Slytherin and making the diary in particular into a Horcrux may have been essentially the same goal. The locket did communicate, after a fashion, but only with Ron Weasley, who had perhaps been a bit too emotionally influenced by it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

tolkiens legendarium - Did Gandalf wear his Ring of Power throughout the trilogy?

After Gandalf discovered that Sauron was back and sent Frodo on his quest to Rivendell, did he continue to wear Narya (one of the Three Rings)? It seems like a huge risk to continue to wear it after the Nazgûl (Ringwraiths) started to try and reclaim the One Ring; if they managed to get the ring to Sauron, couldn't he be corrupted by his power? Whatever powers Narya bestows upon him couldn't possibly be worth the huge risk, could it? Answer When Sauron forged the one ring and put it on his finger, the other ring bearers were immediately aware of him and his intentions and removed their own rings. There is no reason why they couldn't merely do so again. As soon as Sauron set the One Ring upon his finger they were aware of him; and they knew him, and preceived that he would be master of them, and of all they wrought. Then in anger and fear they took off their rings. "Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age," Silmarillion