Skip to main content

harry potter - How does the diary prove Voldemort is the Heir of Slytherin?



Harry: "The diary wasn't that special."
Dumbledore: "The diary, as you have said yourself, was proof that he was the Heir of Slytherin; I am sure that Voldemort considered it of stupendous importance."


Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 23: Horcruxes (slightly more than halfway through)



How does the diary prove that? Sure, it contains a fragment of his soul which can come out and open the chamber, but wouldn't the same be true of any other Horcrux, as well as by Voldemort being able to do it himself? How does the diary lend any additional credence to the claim?



Every other Horcrux was a rare magical item with a long history, but the diary was . . . just a diary. As far as I know the books don't even make it clear where it came from or how Voldemort got it. It was an ordinary notebook. So Dumbledore's argument for why it was chosen, instead of something more special, makes little sense. How is it different from any other object he might have chosen, like a pencil sharpener or a can of WD-40?



Answer



Riddle probably wrote in it


The original quote from Chamber of Secrets might seem to imply that Voldemort made the diary into a Horcrux for the express purpose of opening the Chamber.



"Well, he certainly kept an annoyingly close watch on me after Hagrid was expelled,” said Riddle carelessly. “I knew it wouldn’t be safe to open the Chamber again while I was still at school. But I wasn’t going to waste those long years I’d spent searching for it. I decided to leave behind a diary, preserving my sixteen-year-old self in its pages, so that one day, with luck, I would be able to lead another in my footsteps, and finish Salazar Slytherin’s noble work.”


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



This may be. However, Voldemort may have purchased the diary before opening the Chamber in his fifth year:




Harry saw at once that it was a diary, and the faded year on the cover told him it was fifty years old. He opened it eagerly.


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



This does not mean that it was literally fifty years old, merely approximately so. In any case, even if he purchased it the year he opened the Chamber, he may still have written in it.


Indeed, Harry explicitly says that Riddle wrote the diary:



“It was this diary,” said Harry quickly, picking it up and showing it to Dumbledore. “Riddle wrote it when he was sixteen. . . .


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



The purpose of the diary was ultimately to open the Chamber once more:




"Well, he didn't want his hard work to be wasted," said Harry. "He wanted people to know he was Slytherin's heir, because he couldn't take credit at the time."


Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince



It is this statement that Dumbledore references when he says that the diary proved that Riddle was Slytherin's heir. Nonetheless, I suspect Riddle originally wrote in the diary about his opening the Chamber of Secrets: it is the only interpretation that makes sense.


It seems most likely that Riddle wrote in his diary the details of how he had opened the Chamber. Thus, the diary proved that Riddle had opened the Chamber before he made it into a Horcrux. After he made it into a Horcrux, the piece of soul inside could control the ink in its pages (and thus presumably kept the account hidden).


Alternately, perhaps Riddle made the diary precisely because he needed a Horcrux that could communicate with people directly, which the diary could do by means of the ink spilled on its pages (whereas presumably the diadem could not). As such, proving that he was the Heir of Slytherin and making the diary in particular into a Horcrux may have been essentially the same goal. The locket did communicate, after a fashion, but only with Ron Weasley, who had perhaps been a bit too emotionally influenced by it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...