Skip to main content

harry potter - How does the diary prove Voldemort is the Heir of Slytherin?



Harry: "The diary wasn't that special."
Dumbledore: "The diary, as you have said yourself, was proof that he was the Heir of Slytherin; I am sure that Voldemort considered it of stupendous importance."


Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 23: Horcruxes (slightly more than halfway through)



How does the diary prove that? Sure, it contains a fragment of his soul which can come out and open the chamber, but wouldn't the same be true of any other Horcrux, as well as by Voldemort being able to do it himself? How does the diary lend any additional credence to the claim?



Every other Horcrux was a rare magical item with a long history, but the diary was . . . just a diary. As far as I know the books don't even make it clear where it came from or how Voldemort got it. It was an ordinary notebook. So Dumbledore's argument for why it was chosen, instead of something more special, makes little sense. How is it different from any other object he might have chosen, like a pencil sharpener or a can of WD-40?



Answer



Riddle probably wrote in it


The original quote from Chamber of Secrets might seem to imply that Voldemort made the diary into a Horcrux for the express purpose of opening the Chamber.



"Well, he certainly kept an annoyingly close watch on me after Hagrid was expelled,” said Riddle carelessly. “I knew it wouldn’t be safe to open the Chamber again while I was still at school. But I wasn’t going to waste those long years I’d spent searching for it. I decided to leave behind a diary, preserving my sixteen-year-old self in its pages, so that one day, with luck, I would be able to lead another in my footsteps, and finish Salazar Slytherin’s noble work.”


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



This may be. However, Voldemort may have purchased the diary before opening the Chamber in his fifth year:




Harry saw at once that it was a diary, and the faded year on the cover told him it was fifty years old. He opened it eagerly.


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



This does not mean that it was literally fifty years old, merely approximately so. In any case, even if he purchased it the year he opened the Chamber, he may still have written in it.


Indeed, Harry explicitly says that Riddle wrote the diary:



“It was this diary,” said Harry quickly, picking it up and showing it to Dumbledore. “Riddle wrote it when he was sixteen. . . .


Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets



The purpose of the diary was ultimately to open the Chamber once more:




"Well, he didn't want his hard work to be wasted," said Harry. "He wanted people to know he was Slytherin's heir, because he couldn't take credit at the time."


Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince



It is this statement that Dumbledore references when he says that the diary proved that Riddle was Slytherin's heir. Nonetheless, I suspect Riddle originally wrote in the diary about his opening the Chamber of Secrets: it is the only interpretation that makes sense.


It seems most likely that Riddle wrote in his diary the details of how he had opened the Chamber. Thus, the diary proved that Riddle had opened the Chamber before he made it into a Horcrux. After he made it into a Horcrux, the piece of soul inside could control the ink in its pages (and thus presumably kept the account hidden).


Alternately, perhaps Riddle made the diary precisely because he needed a Horcrux that could communicate with people directly, which the diary could do by means of the ink spilled on its pages (whereas presumably the diadem could not). As such, proving that he was the Heir of Slytherin and making the diary in particular into a Horcrux may have been essentially the same goal. The locket did communicate, after a fashion, but only with Ron Weasley, who had perhaps been a bit too emotionally influenced by it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...