Skip to main content

How was Harry going to kill Sirius Black?


In "The Prisoner of Azkaban", chapter 17, "Cat, Rat, and Dog":



Harry raised the wand. Now was the moment to do it. Now was the moment to avenge his mother and father. He was going to kill Black. He had to kill Black. This was his chance...



How was Harry going to kill him, had he tried to go through with it? It's only his third year, and I don't think he knows any killing curses yet.



Answer




Canonically speaking, I'm going to say that Harry wasn't going to kill Sirius at all. Yes, Harry was blind with anger and hurt, and he dreamed of avenging his parents by killing Sirius, but Harry had not been taught any deadly curses prior to Goblet of Fire and he didn't understand the emotional component of killing another human being. As Bellatrix Lestrange said to Harry, after he failed to cast the Cruciatus curse against Bella in Order of the Phoenix, "You've got to really mean it, Potter!" [Executing the Unforgivables, that is/paraphrase]


However, Harry's experience with any kind of magical killing curse prior to Goblet of Fire is limited to the following:



‘Then kill him, fool, and be done!’ screeched Voldemort.

Quirrell raised his hand to perform a deadly curse, but Harry by instinct, reached up and grabbed Quirrell’s face –

‘AAAARGH!’

Philosopher's Stone - pages 213-214 - Bloomsbury - chapter seventeen, The Man With Two Faces



The "deadly curse" isn't even named! Prior to Goblet of Fire, Harry had not heard of Avada Kedavra.


How Harry knew Quirrell was going to perform a deadly curse -- since Quirrell only raised his wand without saying anything -- is not explained. In canon, aside from Avada Kedavra, no other curse or spell is described as being deliberately lethal, except, I'd argue, Fiendfyre (And even then it's a stretch; it is lethal magic, but its foremost purpose is to burn and destroy; that it is lethal is incidental.).


Before all the talk about Harry wanting to kill Sirius in Prisoner of Azkaban, Harry is determined to hurt Sirius, to try and offload the hurt Harry himself felt due to his parents' death. Harry wanted Sirius to hurt, emotionally, as badly as he did.



He had forgotten about magic – he had forgotten that he was short and skinny and thirteen, whereas Black was a tall, fullgrown man. All Harry knew was that he wanted to hurt Black as badly as he could and that he didn’t care how much he got hurt in return ...

Prisoner of Azkaban - page 249 - Bloomsbury - chapter seventeen, Cat, Rat, and Dog




Harry was not trained in magic well enough to kill Sirius. If he were to actually try (Which I feel is against his characterization. Anger? Yes. Murder? No. Killing is something deep down that Harry would never want to do, although I don't think he regretted killing Voldemort.) I think he would have tried to physically kill Sirius. After all, the thought of magic had fled Harry's mind and he and Sirius had an initial physical altercation. Yes, Harry then pointed his wand at Sirius, but if magic had fled his mind, raising his wand could have merely been reflexive.


Anyhow, there are basically only two ways Harry could have killed Sirius and canon only allows for generalizations: Harry would have killed Sirius either by magic or through physical violence. Order of the Phoenix demonstrates Harry isn't capable of an Unforgivable at age 15, much less 13. There are no canon instances showing Harry physically beating anyone to the point of death. So it's a toss up.


Personally, I don't think Harry would have ever killed Sirius, especially at age thirteen. I do think canon ultimately supports this.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more