Skip to main content

harry potter - Why Did Dudley Have to Have His Piggy Tail Surgically Removed?


Why did Dudley have to have his piggy tail surgically removed? Why wasn't the Accidental Magic Reversal Squad dispatched to remove the tail and modify the Dursleys' memories?


After Uncle Vernon insults Dumbledore one too many a time, Hagrid retaliates by giving Dudley a piggy tail:



He brought the umbrella swishing down through the air to point at Dudley – there was a flash of violet light, a sound like a firecracker, a sharp squeal and next second, Dudley was dancing on the spot with his hands clasped over his fat bottom, howling in pain. When he turned his back on them, Harry saw a curly pig’s tail poking through a hole in his trousers.

[...]

‘Shouldn’ta lost me temper,’ [Hagrid] said ruefully, ‘but it didn’t work anyway. Meant ter turn him into a pig, but I suppose he was so much like a pig anyway there wasn’t much left ter do.’

Philosopher's Stone - page 48 - Bloomsbury - chapter 4, The Keeper of the Keys




So Hagrid's magic didn't work right. Dudley subsequently has to have the pig's tail surgically removed in a Muggle hospital:



‘All right, we’ll take you to King’s Cross. We’re going up to London tomorrow anyway, or I wouldn’t bother.’

‘Why are you going to London?’ Harry asked, trying to keep things friendly.

‘Taking Dudley to hospital,’ growled Uncle Vernon. ‘Got to have that ruddy tail removed before he goes to Smeltings.’

Philosopher's Stone - page 68 - Bloomsbury - chapter 6, The Journey from Platform Nine and Three-Quarters



First, Hagrid is barred from using magic at all. Second, to knowingly use magic in a Muggle-inhabited area, or in front of a Muggle, violates section 13 of the International Confederation of Warlocks’ Statute of Secrecy (OotP - chapter 8, The Hearing). Third, when Harry produces a Patronus in front of Dudley during the Dementor attack in Order of the Phoenix, he immediately receives a letter from Mafalda Hopkirk advising him that he has been expelled from Hogwarts and that he will need to appear for a disciplinary hearing at the Ministry.


How did Hagrid get away with using magic in front of Muggles, and not have been brought up on charges of breeching the International Statute of Secrecy? Since he meant to turn Dudley into a pig, but only managed a piggy tail, does that constitute "accidental" magic? Why didn't the Accidental Magic Reversal Squad show up, magically remove Dudley's tail and modify all three of the Dursleys' memories like they did when Harry accidentally inflated Aunt Marge¹?


★ I do not prefer any answers from the HP Wikia or the Wikipedia.


¹Technically, Aunt Marge was the only Dursley to have her memory modified. The Accidental Magic Reversal Squad left Vernon, Petunia, and Dudley alone.



Answer




Hagrid was old enough that he no longer had "the trace" on him so the Ministry no longer could monitor his magic activity. Initially I thought "but what about Harry's trace?" but Harry hadn't started school yet and I seem to recall that due to that he didn't have the trace put on him yet.


So the answer simply seems to be that the ministry never knew that Dudley had a tail magic'd onto him and Hagrid didn't seem to feel the need to inform them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

What is Tolkien trying to say in this letter?

In a draft of a letter, later recorded as #246, Tolkien makes a strange statement. I am interested in the first few sentences of the letter, but I will include the remainder for the sake of context. In the 'Mirror of Galadriel', 1381, it appears that Galadriel conceived of herself as capable of wielding the Ring and supplanting the Dark Lord. If so, so also were the other guardians of the Three, especially Elrond . But this is another matter. It was part of the essential deceit of the Ring to fill minds with imaginations of supreme power . But this the Great had well considered and had rejected, as is seen in Elrond's words at the Council. Galadriel's rejection of the temptation was founded upon previous thought and resolve. In any case Elrond or Galadriel would have proceeded in the policy now adopted by Sauron: they would have built up an empire with great and absolutely subservient generals and armies and engines of war, until they could challenge Sauron and destroy ...

tolkiens legendarium - Was Galadriel's temptation of Boromir instrumental to his fall?

We know Galadriel tempted the members of the Fellowship, did she tempt Boromir with visions of taking the Ring and saving Gondor? In the books, Boromir willingly accepts the judgement of the council that the Ring should be destroyed, but after the meeting with Celeborn and Galadriel his personality seems to change. Was the temptation offered by Galadriel in some way responsible for Boromir's fall? Answer It's likely, but not certain I believe it is likely Galadriel tempted him with the ring, and in doing so re-ignited a pre-existing idea to take the ring, but to be clear lets break this down into three parts. Boromir at the Council of Elrond Boromir after setting off Boromir after being tempted Boromir at the Council of Elrond Boromir pleas for the ring to go to Minas Tirith, to help Gondor in its defense against Mordor. “ Why should we not think that the Great Ring has come into our hands to serve us in the very hour of need? Wielding it the Free Lords of the Free may surely...

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...