Skip to main content

marvel - Can Mystique create objects?


When Mystique shape-shifts, she looks like the person she wants to imitate with their clothes on.


Now, if she removes these clothes and puts them away and then returns to her original form, do the clothes stay there? If so, isn't she violating one of the fundamental laws of physics, that something can't be created from nothing?



Answer




Yes, In a very limited sense, the revised version of the character (after her 2001 upgrade) may be able to make very small objects which could retain their existence as long as she thinks about them. She was always able to create small accessories (purses, belts, handbags, hand mirrors, eyeglasses) which augmented her disguises and no one ever thought deeply about it.


I suspect her upgrade was less about making objects and more about turning her into a more malleable and hopefully interesting living weapon. If I were a responsible writer, I would try and keep such transformations into objects into short term events. Or just create a material she could transform in the same fashion as she does her cellular structure.



  • Mystique was once limited to changing the appearance of her cellular structure so she could resemble a person's physical makeup and appearance up to and including clothing. She also had perfect pitch and could imitate the sound of a person's voice as well.

  • She made her body into the material she needed to appear as. This would let her imitate small detachable objects such as purses, or metallic objects such as zippers or clasps aiding in the authenticity of the objects appearance.

  • The problem was her powers were poorly defined and poorly explained. I suspect this had more to do with the character's origin and popularity requiring writers to "make it up as they went along." When you started thinking about HOW the character did what she did, inconsistencies were starting to show up.


This required an analysis of her powers and eventually a correction to their description:





  • Her cellular structure was far more malleable than believed since she could make metal where our bodies did not have nearly as much metal available at the cellular level.




  • She was not just transforming her cells, she was transforming matter at a limited level.




  • She had been seen converting metals from her clothing into weapons. It was not disclosed whether that was a special technology or a power she kept hidden until then.




  • In 2001's X-Men Forever miniseries, Mystique is exposed to dangerous levels of radiation in order to save the life of Toad. The process morphs Mystique's appearance to match her more reptilian physique from the 2000s film trilogy, and boosts her powers so that she can now morph her body into taking certain desired physical traits depending on her situation at the time.





  • With her revised powers (a classic Marvel "Radiation Accident") her transformations now include powers such as night vision, wings on her back, talons in her fingers, and natural body armor. These powers make more sense since she would be getting them by imitating things already seen in nature. A cat-like eye would have better night vision, for example.




  • She can even compress nearly two-dimensional like a sheet of paper to glide on air currents, similar to Mister Fantastic, which she uses to survive an explosion. She has moved her vital organs out of place in order to survive a gunshot to her torso. This is a bit more of a stretch (pardon the pun) but since matter transformation has been shown, the writers decided to go ahead and utilize it in a limited fashion, giving the character more durability and flexibility in combat.




  • She has, once with strain, given herself two heads and four arms to facilitate a gun fight on two fronts, as well as shapeshifted into herself as a small child. She is also now able to hold a shape when knocked unconscious and can conceal items in shapeshifted pouches under her skin.





Mystique Two Heads, four arms



  • The two heads, four arms thing was overkill (I will attribute it to the 'moment of awesome' trope) but her being able to maintain her shape after being rendered unconscious only makes sense, or she would have surely blown more covers as a double agent over the years. Size changing, we will go with matter transformation again. So many heroes can do it, you should be able to hand-wave it away.


This was clearly the case of a character whose powers were poorly defined and allowed her to do things that were not explained well (where did her clothes come from, how did she take them off, where did the metal in her clothing come from, why didn't she have the power to transform into shapes other than human, why didn't she get any special abilities, etc) and "corrected" during a movie tie-in. This made the character appear physically the same as her movie version and allowed writers to try and clean up and stabilize a power suite that would allow her to keep up with the diverse powers of the X-men.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...