Skip to main content

harry potter - Do wizards need Muggles?


I was just thinking, if some Dark wizard succeeded in a Mugglepocalypse - what then?


Are they just some extinct species of animal at that point or do Muggles have some value wizards would lose?



Answer




While the total extinction of Muggles may cause wizards some problems, it seems likely that they'll be able to handle any problems it poses.


There would be enough wizards for a minimum viable population so it's likely they'll survive.


The reason the Gaunts were so deformed due to inbreeding is because they limited their choices to pure-blooded British wizards whose families were one of only a few British pure-blood families. Depending on the size of the wizard population they may become inbred like the Gaunts. If the wizarding populations are sufficiently small, they may be unable to avoid inbreeding, and either create offspring with genetic defects, or choose not to reproduce and die off. However, the global wizarding population likely contains enough members to prevent this. The global population of wizards is surely much larger than the number of respected pure-blood wizard families in Britain, and likely is large enough to provide the minimum viable population required to keep them from dying off.



Researchers have studied how many people would be required to create a stable long term population. Some suggest a number of 160 would be enough, but that figure is also questioned often and may not work. A number often cited as the optimal number of people needed to create a viable population without excessive inbreeding is somewhere around 5000. Another study gives a higher number of 10,000 people, which the study says will ensure against both inbreeding and something killing off part of the population. While none of these numbers may be exact, once there are reasonably more wizards than this, it seems highly likely that they will survive. Even at the lowest number given by JKR math, there are more students in Hogwarts than 160, and that's just one school in Britain. The total number of wizards globally is surely much higher.


Humans have survived, and without widespread defects due to inbreeding, with fairly small populations, and until recently, very few ways of accessing other humans too far outside their own place of living. Also, research has shown that human populations were very low at certain points in history. While scientists disagree about the exact numbers, they do agree that the human population was drastically lower, and are saying it may have been as low as 2000 individuals. The highest estimate given in that study for the population was around 10,000 fertile women. Even using that number as a baseline, the global wizarding population would have enough members to meet this requirement as well.


There are at least 100,000 wizards in the world, since that's the number of wizards Arthur Weasley, an employee of the Ministry of Magic, says would be attending the Quidditch World Cup.



“The trouble is, about a hundred thousand wizards turn up to the World Cup, and of course we just haven’t got a magical site big enough to accommodate them all. There are places Muggles can’t penetrate, but imagine trying to pack a hundred thousand wizards into Diagon Alley or platform nine and three-quarters.” - Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Chapter 6 (The Portkey)



That's just the number of wizards who are willing and able to attend the Quidditch World Cup. That doesn't account for wizards who don't care about Quidditch, or were busy, or had other responsibilities, or were too poor to afford going. The number in the total global population of wizards would be therefore at least somewhat higher, likely a large portion higher. After all, even though something like the Super Bowl is a very popular sporting event, only a fraction of Americans attend it.


In addition, Muggles might not be necessary to manage the technology they'd leave behind.


Sure, the Muggles might have created things like nuclear reactors, but while wizards probably wouldn't understand this technology, they could almost certainly dispose of it. They would have no reason to keep it around since they don't use Muggle technology. In addition, they wouldn't have to keep their disposal methods secret or hidden from the Muggles, since they'd be all dead. Wizards wouldn't be able to manage a nuclear power plant, but even if it took multiple wizards working together, they would be able to Evanesco it, or otherwise make it disappear.


Wizards might not expect the problems that unmanaged Muggle technology might bring, but even if they don't, they could likely still handle it. If some disaster starts happening, they could probably take care of it with magic. They'd be able to use the full force of their powers at any disaster they encounter, since they no longer have to be concerned with keeping their magic hidden from anyone. In addition, not all wizards are as unaware of Muggle technology as Arthur Weasley is. All it would take is one wizard (perhaps a Muggle-born like Hermione) who knows about nuclear reactors to tell the others, and get the problem handled.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...