Skip to main content

marvel - How does Mystique change height?


If mass and matter cannot be created nor destroyed, then how does Mystique get taller or shorter, for example when she



imitates Trask in X-Men: Days of Future Past




Do her atoms and organs simply rearrange themselves? Does she become more dense?



Answer



In the X-Men Cinematic Timeline, we have been given no canon to explain her morphogenic abilities. Given that the Hulk acquires 600+ pounds during his transformation, there is no reason Mystique couldn't do the same.




  • In her earliest comic appearances, she was limited to shape-shifting, taking on the appearance of a humanoid within certain physical parameters. She could lengthen her bones and change the appearance of her flesh to appear as nearly perfect replicas of anyone she had ever seen.




  • She was supposedly just moving her physical mass to create a sculpture of her target (though this made no sense because she would end up being hollow or having cells capable of altering their size at will, nearly instantaneously able to "bulk up" in appearance without changing their actual capacities.





  • Over the character's existence, power upgrades now allow her to shape-change, drastically altering her body's physical characteristics including shape, length, durability, color and possibly even mass.




In the canon Earth-616 Timeline


In the previous Scifi Question: Can Mystique CREATE Objects? The canon character received an update to her powers and abilities in the classic Marvel style.



In 2001's X-Men Forever miniseries, Mystique is exposed to dangerous levels of radiation in order to save the life of Toad. The process morphs Mystique's appearance to match her more reptilian physique from the 2000s film trilogy, and boosts her powers so that she can now morph her body into taking certain desired physical traits depending on her situation at the time.


With her revised powers (a classic Marvel "Radiation Accident") her transformations now include powers such as night vision, wings on her back, talons in her fingers, and natural body armor. These powers make more sense since she would be getting them by imitating things already seen in nature. A cat-like eye would have better night vision, for example.






  • This 'radiation accident' gave Mystique the ability to alter her size and shape in fashions far more drastic than her previous limitations of a humanoid-only appearance between 4 feet and 7 feet tall, WITHOUT apparently altering her mass.




  • At least, this is how the Marvel Handbook editors wanted to present it. They were inconsistent with the portrayals in the comics, which led to altering her canon abilities to explain away previous inconsistencies.




  • So they created an event which gave her the ability to alter all aspects of her physical self without any particular limitations including mass. If mass from "some extradimensional source" was good enough for the Hulk, the Thing, She-Hulk, and Colossus, it was good enough for Mystique.





Mystique's powers increased dramatically.


Mystique's powers increased dramatically from shape-shifting to shape-changing.


In the X-Men movies universe




  • We have not been given a clear definition of her powers but they seem to resemble the previous canon versions of the character. She does not appear to be able to alter her size and weight beyond 4 to 7 feet, but it would be readily apparent to anyone who grappled her in her shapechanged form, she was not nearly massive enough to account for her physical appearance in size.




  • Is this an oversight? Probably, with all of the more physically impressive powers, it is often the smallest powers that defy the laws of physics without explanation ever given to them. The "creation" of mass in characters who change size or shape being one of those things taken for granted by writers, editors, and comic artists (and now movie producers).





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...