Skip to main content

harry potter - Why doesn't either side in the Wizarding War use Felix Felicis?


I was thinking about an answer to an older question about HBP, and it dawned on me: merely getting a confirmation that there were 7 Horcruxes was important but hardly the most critical endeavour of the entire War (actually getting and destroying Horcruxs was). So why was Felix only used once, in that specific case?



We know Felix Felicis is hard to make, but we also know that it's possible to make. Slughorn can, for example.


Why doesn't either side in the War pay someone like Slughorn to make Felix for them?


A critical mission - like Dumbledore going to Gaunt shack, etc... - would be well worth the price no matter how expensive the potion is. And Slug likes his creature comforts, so he would be more than willing to put in the effort if paid well.


Hell, it is not so super priceless and rare and hard to make that Slug wasn't willing to give one as a prize to one of his students!


The obvious reasons don't seem to work:




  • Money is no object. Either side has wealthy wizards who can pay (Malfoy, Harry, Longbottom). For that matter, even if Dumbledore is not himself wealthy, he's a great enough wizard that he can trade some magical favors/inventions to Slughorn or another potion maker of his caliber.





  • Felix is not some deeply held secret. It's listed as prohibited aid for sporting events.




  • The fact that at the very least Slughorn is an advanced potion maker who can do it is also not exactly a secret - he told Harry's class he can make it, and probably told prior students of his (Tom Riddle included).




  • "... highly toxic in large quantities" answer from Slughorn from HBP. But there's a difference between frequent use/large quantities; and strategic rare use for critical missions (e.g. retrieving/destroying Horcruxes). Both Dumbledore and Voldemort possess enough willpower to enforce that (and DEs wouldn't even care too much in the first place)




I would strongly prefer canon based or JKR answers.




Answer



Well, there's always the consideration that Voldemort's side did use Felix Felicis at times. Canon doesn't indicate otherwise (and I realize that the absence of information does not a fact make). I think it's okay to consider the possibility that the Death Eaters engaged any and all methods of magic that might have given them an advantage, and it's fair to say that the Death Eaters had their fair share of successes and triumphs in their endeavors.


Felix Felicis is a tricky potion to brew and probably wouldn't be the best choice for mass production and consumption. In chapter 24 of Half-Blood Prince, Sectumsempra, Harry reads the instructions for Felix Felicis (which is indeed in the sixth year book Advanced Potion-Making, so there's no question that Snape would have known how to brew it) and notes that not only are the ingredients complex, but that it takes six months to brew Felix Felicis. War does not wait for a potion to finish brewing. Keeping Felix Felicis in supply, on demand, would have been incredibly difficult, if not impossible.


You already mentioned that Felix Felicis is toxic in high quantities. In Half-Blood Prince, chapter 9, The Half-Blood Prince, Slughorn mentions quite a few things about Felix Felicis. It's disastrous when brewed improperly. Slughorn doesn't mention how a potioneer would be able to tell if the potion wasn't brewed correctly, but if it's one of those situations where one wouldn't know until they take the potion, Felix Felicis would then be an incredibly risky potion to dole out to the troops on a regular basis.


Slughorn says Felix Felicis should be taken only sparingly and on occasion. Taking it too often causes giddiness, recklessness, and a false sense of overconfidence. He also says that this potion works from "dawn to dusk" -- what about any combat that takes place after dusk?¹


Naturally, Felix Felicis is an inherently abusable potion for those seeking the wonderful feelings of unstoppable confidence and accomplishment. In this regard, it would be at high risk for being regularly stolen by individuals looking to experience those particular feelings again and again.


Also, I think Felix Felicis gives the taker what they need, not what they want -- an important distinction. Harry needed Slughorn's memory of Tom Riddle. So bringing the topic back to a wartime situation, one person might want to kill another during a duel, but what they need is just to escape the situation alive, and Felix Felicis might facilitate escaping alive, but not the desire to take another's life.


¹This is actually contradicted in chapter 22 of Half-Blood Prince, After the Burial.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.