Skip to main content

the terminator series - What is Skynet's ultimate goal after defeating the resistance?


Is it stated in any expanded universe what Skynet's plans were after wiping out the Human race (assuming that was its plan)?


Maybe space travel to colonise different planets or something else entirely?




Answer



In T2, Skynet's decision is defensive; it launches the U.S. nuclear arsenal, triggering the Soviet counterattack, because the alternative is to let its panicked technicians cut its power and "die". From a certain point of view, Skynet's actions are only to be expected. The ensuing war against humanity would also be one of necessity; after killing billions, the remaining humans would seize any chance for revenge by destroying Skynet, so Skynet's only chance for self-preservation is to kill all the remaining humans.


I didn't pay a lot of attention to T3, but I do know that after Dyson's death and the subsequent loss of the T-800's chip and Dyson's prototype, Skynet rematerialized as a distributed "spareware" platform like the SETI@Home application. Why it went berserk in that form is beyond me, probably hand-waved as a bug in the software. How Skynet survived the thermonuclear Armageddon with enough of the hardware and data infrastructure still functioning in order to maintain this distributed digital sentience is a hole I don't even think the writers cared too much about.


As far as what Skynet intended to happen next, well, it's already happening in the future times, like in the opening T2 scenes and in Salvation. Not every area of Earth is a war zone; some areas, mostly former population centers, would be uninhabitable by humans, and any remaining structures would be taken over by machines. My speculation as to what those machines would be doing is exactly that, but it stands to reason the machines would be working, either on the war effort or to rebuild urban centers for their own use.


Once the very last human is dead, I imagine Skynet and the machines would turn their attention to long-term survival; the nuclear winter caused by fallout from the global apocalypse, combined with the destruction of infrastructure and energy reserves, would make existence on Earth a bleak prospect even for the machines. The machines would have to rebuild the energy infrastructure that makes our current civilization possible. They might find a still-functioning nuclear plant somewhere (the specs for the U.S. nuclear industry are extremely conservative), a solar array or wind farm out in such a remote area it wasn't worth nuking, or similar, which would sustain a small complement of machine workers as they brought new power stations online. The collapse of the food web (which would pose a serious threat to human life long after Skynet was destroyed, if that were the outcome) wouldn't be a concern; the machines run on electricity. The problem is getting it in a post-nuclear Earth.


Once immediate problems of survival were tackled, the logical next step is to improve the machines as a "race". Recovering lost technology and knowledge, such as the tools needed for space exploration, would be the key to the machines' long-term future, meaning the machines could spread beyond the devastated Earth to new planets and moons in the Solar System, and eventually much further. They wouldn't have to be as picky as humans do, nor bring along as much crap; they could survive in extremes of temperature, extreme highs or lows of atmospheric pressure etc, as long as they had a solar or radiothermal energy source keeping them functional as they built more permanent infrastructure. As seen by our current space exploration efforts, robots are actually better suited for the colonization of space than we are. The Opportunity rover, originally intended for 90 Martian days (a Martian day being about a half hour longer than our own), is still active and working 9 years after landing (Spirit also outlived its original mission, but "only" lasted 6 years). No human mission to Mars could even approach that; we simply do not have the technology to send all the necessary material to Mars for a long-term human expedition.


In short, the machines' extreme long-term plans for their race would likely mirror our own; learn, expand, discover. In that sense, even if humans did fall victim as a species to our own inventions, we'd live on in the "spirit" of our sentient artifices.


Legal disclaimer: almost everything in this answer is pure speculation on my part. I have no personal or professional relationship to any writer, actor, director, producer, studio or production company involved in the making of any of the four Terminator films, and as such I have no first-hand or indirect knowledge of any universe created by any of the above which is not portrayed in at least one of the films, and therefore I can only make educated guesses based on what I have seen and what can be reasoned logically.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...