Skip to main content

star wars - Could a magnetic field disable a lightsaber?


Related: Are the magnetic fields of a lightsaber Canon?


From the linked question, we are assuming that a lightsaber is a tube-shaped magnetic field containing plasma. If this is the case, would a strong magnetic field generated by some outside source interfere with a lightsaber, possibly collapsing it and either disabling the lightsaber or allowing the plasma to diffuse in an unrestrained manner?



Answer



No. It should not be possible for an undirected magnetic field, external to a lightsaber, to be powerful enough to affect the plasma contained within nor the magnetic bottle formed by the lightsaber. Considering the history of the lightsaber and its manufacture having thousands of years of development and experimentation, it seem a reasonable assessment to assume a lightsaber would be stable under almost any condition or environment.



  • Even the the material cortosis did not affect the blade, it attacked the energy cycle of the blade's power system, causing it to need to be reset after a few minutes.



Cortosis ore was a very rare, brittle, fibrous material whose conductive properties caused lightsabers to temporarily short out upon contact, although the wielder could solve this problem by turning the blade back on after a few seconds. This effect made cortosis a useful material for anti-lightsaber melee weapons, though with repeated strikes, a lightsaber could still cut through it. Cortosis, due to its heat and energy resistant properties, was also resistant to blaster fire.




For the record: Despite the claim of superconductivity loops only drawing power when cutting, there is no (known) explanation for how a lightsaber generates and maintains its prodigious energy output without an enormous powerplant. That said:



  • Since the Republic/Empire is rife with advanced technology, there should certain be environments where strong magnetic fields should be found. We have never seen any circumstance where lightsabers do not work. In space, underwater, under blaster fire, through duranium doors, nothing seems to impede a lightsaber in progress, except another lightsaber. There may be a case for a very powerful force field since even the Jedi hate the droideka.


Droideka



Often, Droideka were also equipped with deflector shield generators. These personal energy shields projected could endure much punishment, capable of deflecting or absorbing virtually any manner of energy or projectile fire up to the level of a light artillery bolt, as well as rebuffing lightsaber blades and physical attacks. The shields were powered by a starship-class fusion generator housed in a bulb at the junction of the droideka's legs. However, there was a weak point at the very top of the shield, a point where lightsabers would be able to penetrate.





  • We are told the most dangerous time for a lightsaber is the initial creation of it. After that it is perfectly stable. Yet all of the parts are force-configured and force-tightened. The manufactured parts are Republic/Jedi created requiring the very specialized crystal to be activated.


Luke's lightsaber construction




  • This implies almost no force directed at a lightsaber can disrupt its mechanism, even another Force-user does not attempt to turn off a lightsaber. Knock it from a hand, yes. Cause it to stop functioning or unlock it's force-oriented configuration to cause it to malfunction? No. Never seen it. Either it is very difficult (impossible) or cannot be done as long as the Jedi who configured it is using it.




  • From purely an engineering standpoint, the lightsaber has to be a marvel of design. It is capable of holding intact a magnetic field of fiery plasma capable of melting steel, yet can be flung around a battlefield without fear of misfire or explosion. I have never seen a lightsaber explode during a fight. Considering even the Darksaber found after thousands of years in a vault being operational implies their design would be an engineering miracle by human standards.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...