Skip to main content

ghostbusters - Why do Dana and Tully act so differently?



I was rewatching the first Ghostbusters film, and picked up on something I'd not noticed before. Dana and Tully are possessed by Gozer the Gozerian's pet hell hounds, the gate keeper and the key master, two halves of the same plot device.


Except Dana has picked up all of the composure, and alertness. Whilst she is vetting hellish suitors, Tully is chatting to horses and getting scanned by Egon.


At one pain Tully starts to mimic Egon, ignoring an attempt at getting to his counterpart.


Why is one's mind addled, and the other fine?



Answer



There are many things to consider here.


Firstly, you must consider the roles of the demons. The Gatekeeper's entire purpose was to receive the key and open the way. S/He (gender becomes difficult to discern with hellish dog-monsters that make a habit of possession) remains at the apartment, having captured Dana there.


The Keymaster, however, has to chase Louis across Manhatten, ends up in an area that no Dark Ages monstrosity would recognize, surrounded by unfamiliar sights and sounds.


Secondly, you must consider that the demons are not really all that bright. They seem to have a lot of knowledge about their purpose (and at least some ability to disguise what they truly know), but they know little or nothing outside of it. They also seem to be unable to act outside of a host, who is chosen by location in advance of the arrival of the demonic agents. Most likely, residents of the appropriate floor were considered, and two chosen well in advance of the arrival of the demonic dogs. This is only reasonable, as we see the demon stalking Dana at least several days in advance, and the Keymaster ignores everyone at the party in favor of Louis (not to mention people on the street, in the lobby, etc).


Next, consider the people possessed. Dana is a fairly conservative woman in dress and attitude. She's calm and collected, an 'Average Jane'. She shows something of an affection for Venkman's charms, but also sees right through a lot of his BS.



Louis suffers from several minor mental issues. He's neurotic, eager to please, and has an inferiority complex. He tries to cover his nervousness with an outward exuberance and talks way too much.


Similarly, the Gatekeeper is calm and collected. S/He's patient and simple. S/He waits for the Keymaster to find her. S/He answers the door with a simple identity request, looking for a positive response, and doesn't put up with anyone who doesn't give it. She has a distinct lack of complexity, but what can you expect from a dog?


The Keymaster, however, is eager to find the Gatekeeper. He runs around, experiencing everything he can. Louis' observed actions remind me of nothing more than a hyperactive puppy in a new situation for the first time.


In short, the personalities of the demon-possessed are reflections of their normal personalities, though distorted. It's not obvious if this is because their personalities influence the demonic presence or if they were chosen because of those personality traits.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...