Skip to main content

ghostbusters - Why do Dana and Tully act so differently?



I was rewatching the first Ghostbusters film, and picked up on something I'd not noticed before. Dana and Tully are possessed by Gozer the Gozerian's pet hell hounds, the gate keeper and the key master, two halves of the same plot device.


Except Dana has picked up all of the composure, and alertness. Whilst she is vetting hellish suitors, Tully is chatting to horses and getting scanned by Egon.


At one pain Tully starts to mimic Egon, ignoring an attempt at getting to his counterpart.


Why is one's mind addled, and the other fine?



Answer



There are many things to consider here.


Firstly, you must consider the roles of the demons. The Gatekeeper's entire purpose was to receive the key and open the way. S/He (gender becomes difficult to discern with hellish dog-monsters that make a habit of possession) remains at the apartment, having captured Dana there.


The Keymaster, however, has to chase Louis across Manhatten, ends up in an area that no Dark Ages monstrosity would recognize, surrounded by unfamiliar sights and sounds.


Secondly, you must consider that the demons are not really all that bright. They seem to have a lot of knowledge about their purpose (and at least some ability to disguise what they truly know), but they know little or nothing outside of it. They also seem to be unable to act outside of a host, who is chosen by location in advance of the arrival of the demonic agents. Most likely, residents of the appropriate floor were considered, and two chosen well in advance of the arrival of the demonic dogs. This is only reasonable, as we see the demon stalking Dana at least several days in advance, and the Keymaster ignores everyone at the party in favor of Louis (not to mention people on the street, in the lobby, etc).


Next, consider the people possessed. Dana is a fairly conservative woman in dress and attitude. She's calm and collected, an 'Average Jane'. She shows something of an affection for Venkman's charms, but also sees right through a lot of his BS.



Louis suffers from several minor mental issues. He's neurotic, eager to please, and has an inferiority complex. He tries to cover his nervousness with an outward exuberance and talks way too much.


Similarly, the Gatekeeper is calm and collected. S/He's patient and simple. S/He waits for the Keymaster to find her. S/He answers the door with a simple identity request, looking for a positive response, and doesn't put up with anyone who doesn't give it. She has a distinct lack of complexity, but what can you expect from a dog?


The Keymaster, however, is eager to find the Gatekeeper. He runs around, experiencing everything he can. Louis' observed actions remind me of nothing more than a hyperactive puppy in a new situation for the first time.


In short, the personalities of the demon-possessed are reflections of their normal personalities, though distorted. It's not obvious if this is because their personalities influence the demonic presence or if they were chosen because of those personality traits.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...