Skip to main content

In Star Trek, does the transporter conserve the momentum of transported objects?


In Star Trek (2009), when Kirk and Hikaru Sulu are falling from the drill, at the last moment Ensign Chekov locks on them and is able to transport them inside the ship.



By the time they were transported, they have gained a lot of momentum due to free fall, but when they are inside the ship they just experienced a mild thud.



  • Where did that much amount of momentum go?

  • Does momentum conservation not apply to Teleportation in the Star Trek Universe?


As far as i know from the game 'Portal', momentum was being conserved there. link



Answer



Does momentum conservation not apply to transporter operation in the Star Trek Universe? From what we have been shown, apparently not.


Given the transporters already violate so many of our current laws of physics including:




  • mass-to-energy conversion and back again,

  • quantum data storage and information manipulation,

  • not to mention manipulation of subspace to move the matter stream from one location to another,

  • the manipulation of an aspect of matter as simple as momentum from a falling object should be relatively easy to reduce a percentage of that in transport, possibly bleeding it off into subspace at the completion of the transport and reconstruction cycle.


Okay, it's not so simple but let's reverse engineer it and see if we can make it make sense...


What we know


The Law of Conservation of Momentum does indicate that within a closed system, momentum is conserved.



  • Two Starfleet officers are plunging to the deaths on the planet below.


  • As such, the closed system is composed of the officers, the planet and their momentum gained in freefall.

  • The conservation takes place when the potential energy of their fall is converted to kinetic energy upon landing, creating a nice cloud of dust, some heat from impact, and the squashing of all of their bones and organs to a nice jelly.


enter image description here


Did anyone else think this was a bad idea?


HOWEVER




  • Add a transporter beam which adds energy to this closed system, converts matter into energy and dematerializes the matter into a subspace confinement beam and then stores that stream of matter as a signal in a pattern buffer and biofilter.





  • IS THAT MATTER MOVING ANY LONGER?




  • Not at all. So any momentum the matter has after it is reconstituted should be able to be manipulated as just another variable in the transporter resequencing, meaning it can be modified or even removed if necessary.




  • I mention this because we have seen the transporter grab fighter pilots from the seats of their moving planes coming right at the Enterprise. (Tomorrow is Yesterday - TOS, Episode 1x21)





  • We have also seen the crew of the Galileo 7 being transported back to the Enterprise as the shuttlecraft they were on was re-entering the planet's atmosphere. (The Galileo Seven - TOS, Episode 1x13)




  • For that matter, anytime anyone is transported to any other location, there is almost always a movement differential that must be accounted for. Ships in orbit transporting anyone to the ground have to account for the rotational energy of the planet. I doubt seriously orbiting ships are forced to match course and speed to compensate for planetary rotation...




  • If momentum was conserved, they would splat against the wall of the transporter room upon reintegration, so it must be possible to treat momentum as just another variable to be manipulated mid-transport.




As to the Portal Gun



The level of technological sophistication between the transporter and the portal gun is the same level of difference between a bonfire and a tokamak reactor.




  • The portal gun opened a dimensional rift between two locations able to be bridged almost like a stable wormhole between two points.




  • Since the wormhole generated is still just an open doorway from one location to the next, all the gravitational, physical and energy requirements are unchanged from one side of the portal to the other, things falling between the two locations for example maintain their momentum and trajectory.




  • This means all normal physical rules apply since the only variation in the physics is the doorway between the two locations in space-time. A fall from a great height through one portal in the floor, while another is placed on a nearby wall will transform the energy of the fall into a corresponding distance value depending on the speed of exit from the wall portal.





  • There is no conversion of matter or energy, nor is any form of computational interface involved. Anything moving between the two boundaries is unchanged in any way. These two technologies are vastly different in their physics and their interaction with physical matter.




The Portal Gun simply allows matter to be moved from one location to another without any change in the state of that matter. The transporter is able to affect the state, position, relationship, momentum and energy condition of the transported material reconstituting the matter from an intermediate energy state.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more