Skip to main content

history of - Who is the first minority superhero in mainstream US superhero comics?


This came up after talking with a friend recently. I commented that, with my relative lack of knowledge of comics, I didn't think I had seen any minority superheroes in comics until I saw the Justice League cartoon on Boomerang and realized they had a new Green Lantern (John Stewart). My understanding is there are more minorities in comics than when I was growing up and got to read the odd comic book or two, but when I look at posters for DC and Marvel, most of the characters seem to still be Caucasian.


When and who was the first minority superhero in the two big comic lines (Marvel and DC) in the U.S.?


Note: My intent here was to look at larger US publishing groups, such as Marvel and DC, who were in a situation where they could, for years, publish stories about people within one group (in this case Caucasian and mostly males). With that group in mind, my thought was, "When did they start to make changes and open up to different groups and move past designing all their characters to appeal to one group." That's why I wasn't looking at independent publishers, or cases where a small publisher was publishing within a minority group.



Answer



Edited to add in the correct info about the first minority super hero.


In DC Comics All-Star Western #117 published in February 1961 the first Native American superhero appeared with the horrible name of Super-Chief.


All-Star Western 117 cover; female gunner ripping the holster out of a male gunner's belt with a bullet



A summary of his origin can be found here The Crowning of Super-Chief. Super-Chief appeared in the next two issues and then the series was cancelled.


Marvel introduced the Black Panther in Fantastic Four #52 in July of 1966.


FF #52 cover, featuring Black Panther alongside the titular Fantastic Four


However, it may not be accurate to say that the character is a minority. The Black Panther is in reality T'Challa, King of the fictional African country of Wakanda. Although he would be seen as a minority in the United States due to being African he is not part of the African-American minority in the US.


DC introduced its first minority superhero the Black Racer in June 1971 in New Gods #3.


New Gods 3 cover; Black Racer poiting a gun at New God Orion


The Black Racer may not really qualify as a superhero though. The character is part of Jack Kirby's Fourth World series. The corporeal form of the Black Racer is an African-American Vietnam veteran named Willie Walker. When Darkseid brought the war of the New Gods of New Genesis and Apokolips to Earth the Source, a sort of God like universal shared consciousness, contacted Walker and turned him into the deity known as the Black Racer. The Black Racer's job is to collect the souls of the New Gods when they die and deliver them to Hadis the Fourth World version of Hades.


So where does that leave us if we ignore these two entries. Marvel's next African-American hero was the Falcon introduced in Captain America #117 in September 1969.


Captain America 117 featuring the superhero falcon and a litteral falcon


The Falcon is the alter ego of Sam "Snap" Wilson. He was trained by Captain America after he fought beside him against a group of former Nazis working with the Red Skull. The Falcon did have one definite first in that the word 'Black" wasn't part of his superhero name.



DC's next black superhero appeared in Green Lantern #87 published in December 1971.


Green Lantern #87 cover, John Stewart holding a defeated Hal Jordan


This is the previously noted John Stewart. Artist Neal Adams resisted the powers that be who wanted to name the character Isaiah Washington.


However, all that being said these were not the first non-stereotyped or non-racist African-American characters in comics. These were just the first superheroes.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...