Skip to main content

What percent of Fry's DNA comes from his Grandfather in Futurama?


In the episode Roswell That Ends Well Fry's abnormal parentage is revealed. During the commentary David X Cohen challenges viewers to describe that parentage. I would expect to see all possible answers to the question. Those answers would be:



In a predestinous universe, that is one where Fry always got some % of his DNA from himself; and in a multidimensional universe, where Fry would have at first gotten his DNA from his proper grandfather, but in all future universes somehow gets those same pieces of his DNA from himself. Also, please address the origin of his Y chromosome.




I have seen pieces of this puzzle discussed elsewhere online, however I haven't seen a fully-realized solution.



So, What percent of Fry's DNA really does come from himself? And where does his Y chromosome come from?




Answer



It's been a while since I watched the episode, so you'll have to forgive the fuzzy details. I believe the grandfather in question is Fry's paternal grandfather (father's father), but please correct me if I'm wrong. I have also not listened to the DVD commentary you refer to, so you may well have insight that I lack.


First, the science.


As for the genetics of family; let's talk about general chromosomes, then sex chromosomes. There are 23 pairs of chromosomes in the human body; and one half of each pair of chromosomes comes from each parent (ie 23 single chromosomes from each parent). There are exceptions and fringe cases (Down's Syndrome, for example) but these are unimportant for the purposes of this discussion.


Thus, 50% of Fry's DNA comes from Fry's father, and 50% of Fry's father's DNA comes from HIS father. What is interesting is the way in which genes mutate before they are passed on to offspring. Essentially, in each pair of chromosomes, they can swap around parts of themselves (a process known as crossing over); so that each chromosome the parent supplies to his child is a mixture of both the chromosomes of the parent. Thus a parent is extremely unlikely to pass on his father's or his mother's copy of the chromosome as he received it. This diagram from wikipedia should help visualise the process a bit.



So (excluding sex chromosomes) it is impossible to say how much of fry's DNA comes from his grandfather. But we can assume that of the DNA Fry's father passed on to him, around 50% of that will have come from Fry's grandfather, and the rest from his grandmother; although the exact percentage could be much less or more. You will note that in the wikipedia meiosis diagram, each of the 4 gametes produced has a different composition of red and blue DNA; which is what I am driving at.


But statistically speaking, around 25% of the DNA in Fry's chromosomes comes from his grandfather, or more correctly, around 50% of the DNA in the chromosomes Fry obtained from his father comes from his grandfather.


With sex chromosomes, it's a different story. Each person contains one pair of sex chromosomes; of which there are two types: X and Y. In a normal human (we will again discount rare genetic disorders, such as Kleinfelter's Syndrome), a male has an XY configuration, and a female has an XX configuration. The important part of sex chromosome inheritance is that a male's X chromosome always comes from his mother, and his Y chromosome always comes from his father. This is an important element of sex-linked genetic diseases; which tend to be much more common in males because they only have a single X chromosome. So Fry's Y chromosome will have come entirely from his father, who will have gotten his Y chromosome from HIS father; Fry's grandfather.


So, since we can assume Fry, his father, and his (original) grandfather are all normal human males, it is safe to say that Fry's Y chromosome is that of his paternal grandfather.


That is where the actual science ends. Now we turn to science fiction to deduce the identity of Fry's paternal grandfather. And that depends on the theory of time travel.


If I'm missing any major theories on time-travel please tell me, but I think these are the relevant two options.


First option is that history is fixed, and that travelling back in time to the past and changing something is impossible, because it already happened that way. In this theory, Fry is his own grandfather. Enos is irrelevant, because he never fathered Fry's father; it was Fry himself who fathered his father all along. In this version of events we quickly reach a paradox. Fry gave his Y chromosome to his son, who gave it to fry, who gave it to his son, and so on infinitely. The Y chromosome has no origin. Likewise for around 25% of Fry's DNA.


The second option is that Fry's personal history is fixed, and that changing something in the past will create a new "alternate timeline". So Enos is Fry's paternal grandfather, Fry travels back in time and kills Enos, and copulates with his paternal grandmother. The result of this copulation is irrelevant to Fry's genetics and Fry's timeline, because he has already been born; and already contains Enos's DNA. The paradox in this version of events is that if Fry returns to his original timeline, then the events of Roswell in the past are ignored completely; though this would mean that Bender was never buried there waiting to be rescued in the present. Whereas, if Fry returned to the new alternate timeline's Future, he would never have been born because he killed his grandfather; and the offspring of his encounter with his grandmother (if any) would not have been Fry's father himself.


A third option is that the original Fry came from the second theory of events; and then conceived a first theory Fry's father when he travelled into the past. The resulting Fry would then conceive another Fry's father when HE travelled into the past, and so on. This version of events seems to resolve most paradoxes. There is an ultimate origin of Fry's DNA (Enos), so we know where the original Fry's DNA came from; and we know how that first Fry would pass on that DNA to any "next generation" Fry's. We also have a "multiverse" theory allowing for the branching of timelines, which allows for a rational explanation of how Fry could in fact be his own grandfather; although the question of which timeline Fry returns to after Roswell is still not answered. If the Fry who travelled back in time returned to his own timeline, Bender would not have buried himself in New Mexico for the gang to find in the present. But if he returned to a newly-altered timeline, would he still be the genetic original Fry, or would he be a newly altered Fry who was the result of the encounter with his grandmother?


I don't believe there is (or was meant to be) a definitive answer, but puzzling it out certainly helps make it one of Futurama's strongest episodes!



If anyone can find a flaw in my science or in my time travel logic, please let me know!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Was Barty Crouch Jr. an Occlumens?

An Occlumens is a practitioner of Occlumency , while Occlumency means closing the mind. Despite being in the same school with two great Legilimens (Dumbledore and Snape), he was only discovered to be an impostor after the last round of the Triwizard Tournament in Goblet of Fire : “Moody,” Harry said. He was still in a state of complete disbelief. “How can it have been Moody?” “This is not Alastor Moody,” said Dumbledore quietly. “You have never known Alastor Moody. The real Moody would not have removed you from my sight after what happened tonight. The moment he took you, I knew — and I followed.” Does this mean that Barty Crouch Jr. is an Occlumens? Because if not, then Snape or Dumbledore would have found it out earlier, right? Answer It is not stated anywhere in the books that Legilimency was applied to fake Moody/Crouch jr. The conclusion Dumbledore made (quoted in the question) is based on pure logic, not Legilimency or any other magical means. So unless any other canon inform

game of thrones - Who were the Kingsguard escorting Cersei?

Now to the question... During the scene where Cersei sits on the Iron Throne and is "sworn in" we see her escorted by seven members of the Kingsguard. Now this is what I would expect as that is the correct number. However, I have no idea who they are ! [embedded content] The books pay more attention to detail in this area, but the show is also diverging and outpacing in this regard. We can see that a few of the names are not possible on the show. I have listed the names from the books and given why the reason they could not be members on the show in bold. Ser Jaime Lannister, Lord Commander - Stripped of title Ser Loras Tyrell - Dead and also was never a KG on the show. Ser Osmund Kettleblack - Possible, but not mentioned by name Ser Balon Swann - Possible, but not mentioned by name Ser Meryn Trant - Dead Ser Boros Blount - Possible, but not mentioned by name Ser Robert Strong (aka Zombie Mountain) - Confirmed I know it can be confusing mixing the books and shows, but the qu

character motivation - Why do Hastur & Cthulhu hate each other?

Everything's in the title. Hastur & Cthulhu are both Great Old Ones, yet the former lives on Aldebaran whereas the latter lives in R'lyeh. And both of them hate the other, taking it to the point where Hastur even helps humans who do not worship him if it could bother Cthulhu. My question is : What happened between Hastur & Cthulhu that made them "fight" ? In some stories, they are depicted as half-brothers or at least relatives. Is it written in any story involving one or both of them ? If so, is it possible to get the name of this story ? Answer No relationship between Cthulhu and Hastur was mentioned in any of Lovecraft's original stories (I think Lovecraft only once mentioned Hastur in a list of names of powerful entities in The Whisperer in Darkness, see the quote here ), this rivalry was created by August Derleth in his own "Cthulhu Mythos" stories written after Lovecraft's death. This entry at a Mythos wiki says: Although Cthulhu is

tolkiens legendarium - What real-world substance most closely corresponds to mithril?

While reading descriptions of mithril in The Lord of the Rings, it struck me that its properties might well correspond to a real material, possibly as an alloy with other metals. Is there such a real-world substance? Answer The problem with Mithril as chain mail is not ductility. Even if each link perfectly holds its shape, when a cave troll puts his bulk behind a spear, you have a spearhead-shaped piece of Mithril piercing your chest cavity nearly as deeply as the spearhead would have. Effectively, you have reduced the sharpness of the edge, but the pounds per square inch have not been reduced sufficiently to withstand the mass of a pissed-off cave troll and convert a potential puncture into a mere bruise. Frodo should at least have had broken ribs and crushed organs; squished like a bug. More likely, he'd have had a deep wound with Mithril chain mail stuffed into it. The problem is the weave. Nothing is both flexible enough to behave as seen in the movie when held up and exami