Skip to main content

star wars - Why don't non-Jedi carry lightsabers as tools?



If lightsabers can cut through anything, why don't more people (especially bounty hunters) carry lightsabers as a simple cutting tool?


It has been proven here why non-Jedi don't carry lightsabers as weapons.


However, this questions asks whether there are non-weapon items based on lightsaber technology.


But my question is different: If a non-Jedi can get ahold of a lightsaber, such as Boba-Fett, Grievous or Cad-Bane (the latter two who have used them as weapons, in fact), for example, why doesn't he keep one handy? It doesn't take Jedi training to use one safely in order to cut things. Han Solo has done it on occasion (on Hoth, for example, when he opened the TaunTaun) and didn't think twice about it.


And in The Force Awakens, Finn easily used a lightsaber without any training whatsoever, so it's not a matter of possessing the Force that makes the item able to be used.


[reasons why this is not a duplicate]


This question was marked as a duplicate of this: Are there non-weapon items in the Star Wars universe based on lightsaber technology? However, just from the title you can see the scope is different. Perhaps there are non-weapon tools based on lightsaber technology, but my question is whether non-Jedi carry lightsabers, it has nothing to do with non-weapon, non-lightsaber tools.


[later]


Some of the replies below maintain that non-Jedi people cannot carry a lightsaber because of various reasons. It seems to me that Jedi would certainly be more skilled with a lightsaber on account of their affinity with the force and the relation of the force to the kyber crystal, but other people could definitely use a lightsaber as a tool.


Here is Mark Hammil saying that "definitely" non-Jedis could use lightsabers.




Answer



I think the key issue is acquiring a lightsaber in the first place. Before the Great Jedi Purge there were many Jedi and therefore many lightsabers, but a Jedi would have to lose his lightsaber for a non-Jedi to acquire it -- and any Jedi who lost his lightsaber would try to recover it. After the Great Jedi Purge there were far fewer Jedi and therefore far fewer lightsabers.


The only other way to acquire a lightsaber would be to construct it yourself, but it may be necessary to use to Force to construct one. Even if you don't need to Force to construct one it's probably more difficult to do so than it's worth.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

Which Doctor Who works are canon?

I have been watching a Doctor Who documentary and they mentioned that Paul McGann did audio stories so he wasn't just a one-hit Doctor (and that there are novels featuring his Doctor as well). My question is: is Doctor Who canon just the show, or is it like Star Wars where some books and audios are canon and some are not? The documentary also shows that before 2005 they did audio stories where the Doctor is female and obviously that cannot be — not the female part, but the show doesn't count any female Doctors in episodes like The Day of the Doctor . Answer Nothing, and also everything The definitive piece of writing on Doctor Who canon is this blog post by writer Paul Cornell . I'm essentially going to be summarizing his post here, much less eloquently, but one section I want to quote directly is this: Nobody at the BBC has ever uttered a pronouncement about what is and isn't canonical. (As I'm sure they'd put it, being such enthusiasts for good grammar.) Be...

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...