Skip to main content

the legend of korra - Are you born an avatar?


This may be an obvious question but if you do math according to this question you get the average age of avatars to be 54ish years. This seems quite short. Therefore could theoretically be more then one avatar living at a time and Raava simple moves on at ones death.



Does Raava pass onto the next avatar at death and birth or at some other time?



Answer



Wiki explanation of the Avatar Cycle


Although it has never been explicitly stated that the next avatar is born immediately after the previous one dies, it is heavily implied that the Raava merges with the next Avatar at birth, or at least very near to birth:



  • Air Avatar Yangchen is the oldest named reincarnation of the Avatar, followed by Water Avatar Kuruk, Earth Avatar Kyoshi, Fire Avatar Roku, Air Avatar Aang, and finally Water Avatar Korra.

  • Yangchen died circa 345 BG (Before the Air Nomad Genocide, at the start of the 100 Year War). It is unknown how long she lived.

  • Kuruk was born c. 345 BG and died in 312 BG, living approximately 33 years.

  • Kyoshi was born in 312 BG and died in 82 BG, living 230 years and is confirmed to be the longest living Avatar.

  • Roku was born in 82 BG and died in 12 BG, living 70 years.


  • Aang was born in 12 BG and died in 153 AG, existing for 166 years.

  • Korra was born in 153 AG.


It is a fair assumption that each Avatar is born, lives, and dies as a host of Raava. There is no evidence that Raava is ever disconnected from any Avatar, except for when Raava is forcefully removed and killed at the hand of Vaatu in 171 AG.



If you want to delve in to conjecture as to the ages and number of Avatars:


Wan was born in 9850 BG. Aang died in 153 AG. Aang is the 182nd Avatar. 182 Avatars lived in 10,004 years, making the average life of each avatar 54.967, in practicality 55.


Sometime before Aang, tradition developed to make the Avatar known at age 16, at which point the Avatar entered into training for the other three elements until they become a fully realised Avatar. We know that before the Avatar turns 16, the identity of the Avatar is not revealed to the world, or even the Avatar himself. It is quite likely this is primarily done out of concern for the safety of the Avatar. Certainly, Fire Lord Sozin is not the first person to attempt to kill the Avatar before he comes into his power. It is therefore reasonable to assume that some Avatars died quite young, which would drive the average age down quite a bit. Avatar Kuruk is evidence enough that not all Avatars live to old age. There is no reason to assume that simply because the few Avatars we know of lived for the most part to old age, that the rest of the Avatars would live that long too. In fact, we know our sample includes the longest living Avatar and an Avatar that spent 100 years frozen in a iceberg. That's an incredibly skewed sample even without knowing anything else.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more