Skip to main content

comics - What makes the world so oblivious to Clark Kent's secret?


Superman's alter ego is Clark Kent. Unlike many other superheroes, Superman dresses up as a human to fit in.


What makes the world so oblivious to Clark Kent's secret; Superman? (In regards his poor disguise).



Answer



Superman has always been a public figure, but he doesn't wear a mask. His entire face is visible to all, and he willingly has photos taken, kisses babies, etc. Batman, Flash, Green Lantern (the Hal Jordan version at least), etc. ALL wear masks to cover their faces. Their masks make people wonder what is beneath them.


Similarly, since Superman doesn't wear a mask, many (if not most) people assume he has no secret identity. This is aided by the fact that he's always been very open about his back story - he's NOT human, just human-looking. He's openly admitted that he is the last survivor of an alien race, and that he's adopted Earth as his home. It is difficult for people to believe that someone with so much raw power, who has been so open, has a secret. They may wonder what Superman is doing at the moment, but they never wonder who he is.


For those who DO suspect he has a secret identity, Clark Kent is not a likely suspect. The only similarities are his hair style and color (though he does subtly change his hair style as CK, when not wearing a hat), basic build, and eye color. Glasses do quite a bit to change the shape of your face, especially when you never publicly remove them.


Then we have the steps Superman takes to make his disguise more effective. Clark Kent almost always wears a suit and tie. He wears a button-down shirt, suit coat, tie, nice pants, and simple shoes. He prefers dark browns or blues, and rarely removes any of his clothing layers (excepting overcoats when appropriate) except around family and close friends. Superman wears a very bold costume, skin tight, with a big, billowing cape. His musculature is evident. This disparity does quite a bit to make Clark Kent's body type look different from Superman's.


Superman is also an accomplished actor, in a limited scope. In essence, he's spent years creating a single persona - Clark Kent - and he can drop into it in a heartbeat. Everything about Clark Kent is different from Superman. Clark has an entirely different posture, different speech patterns, and different word choice. Clark is passive, except when he is actively working on a story, Superman is... not brash, but firm.


From a personality perspective, physical perspective, and presumption perspective, Clark Kent is decidedly NOT a candidate for Superman's secret identity, to 99.99999% of the world.



For everything else, there's Super-Hypnotism.




The blog 'Texts From Superheroes' poses an alternative explanation:


Metallo Learns Lex isn't Stupid


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

tolkiens legendarium - Did Gandalf wear his Ring of Power throughout the trilogy?

After Gandalf discovered that Sauron was back and sent Frodo on his quest to Rivendell, did he continue to wear Narya (one of the Three Rings)? It seems like a huge risk to continue to wear it after the Nazgûl (Ringwraiths) started to try and reclaim the One Ring; if they managed to get the ring to Sauron, couldn't he be corrupted by his power? Whatever powers Narya bestows upon him couldn't possibly be worth the huge risk, could it? Answer When Sauron forged the one ring and put it on his finger, the other ring bearers were immediately aware of him and his intentions and removed their own rings. There is no reason why they couldn't merely do so again. As soon as Sauron set the One Ring upon his finger they were aware of him; and they knew him, and preceived that he would be master of them, and of all they wrought. Then in anger and fear they took off their rings. "Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age," Silmarillion