Skip to main content

harry potter - Can this inconsistency in the ability of the Summoning Charm (Accio) to summon animals be explained?


J.K. Rowling has wrote on her website that the Summoning Charm only works on inanimate objects, explaining that creatures and humans can only be summoned by summoning objects they are holding or wearing.



‘Accio’ only works on inanimate objects. While people or creatures may be indirectly moved by ‘Accio-ing’ objects that they are wearing or holding, this carries all kinds of risks because of the likelihood of injury to the person or beast attached to an object travelling at close to the speed of light.
Welcome to my new website! - J.K. Rowling



Wonderbook: Book of Spells, a PS3 game generally considered to be canon, contains this quote supporting Rowling's statement.



Once you have mastered this charm, you have the ability to Summon any object of which you have need (Providing, of course, that you respect the International Statute of Wizarding Secrecy since no object should be Summoned if it is likely to whizz under the nose of a Muggle). The Summoning Charm is ineffective on most living creatures, and those that can be Summoned are rarely worth Summoning (such as Flobberworms).
Book of Spells (ellipses replaced with spaces), see source video




However, a story told earlier in the game seemingly contradicts this, stating that Gideon Flatworthy, a man who was apparently rather skilled in the Summoning Charm, managed to summon the cows that crushed him to death.



Experts still debate what precisely led to his final, foolish act. Most agree that he had probably become delirious through lack of food although some think that he was determined to die as he had lived. All we know is that, on the eighteenth of September, 1743 Flatworthy attempted to Summon himself an entire farm complete with livestock, cosy cottage and well-stocked larder. Naturally, the buildings would not shift, but the furious farmer followed his flying cows to the cave on the hill and discovered Flatworthy, still lying on his cushions, but crushed to death beneath a pile of hay bales and cattle.
Book of Spells (ellipses replaced with spaces), see source video



While it's possible that the story was exaggerated or fictional, it is billed by fact, and was apparently the subject of dissenting opinions between experts. It's also possible that cows are one of the few animals that can be summoned (though this seems unlikely as they are non-magical and not particularly uncommon) or the cows in question were wearing clothes at the time. However, this is not the only example of the Summoning Charm being used on animate objects, both in likely-fictional stories and in reality. Examples of animals being directly summoned magically, in chronological order:



Inside one house the little girl's warts vanished as she slept; the lost donkey was Summoned from a distant briar patch and set down softly in its stable; the sick baby was doused in dittany and woke, well and rosy.
The Tales of Beedle The Bard - page 10 - The Wizard and the Hopping Pot







When the poor little Snidget flew my way I did a Summoning Charm. You know how good my Summoning Charms are, Pru – of course it was easier for me to aim properly, not being mounted on a broomstick at the time. The little bird came zooming into my hand. I stuffed it down the front of my robes and ran like fury. Well, they caught me, but not before I’d got out of the crowds and released the Snidget.
Quiddich Through The Ages, pages 12 & 13 (in the writing of Madam Modesty Rabnott)






NEWT: Accio Niffler!
The case bursts open and a Niffler jumps out.

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald - The Original Screenplay - scene 48 (reformatted slightly)






NEWT (of the Niffler): Where is he? Ah, Accio Niffler.
The Niffler is carried by the spell back into the case. NEWT takes the case and dashes off.
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald - The Original Screenplay - scene 48 (reformatted slightly)







Harry pointed his wand at the bullfrog that had been hopping hopefully towards the other side of the table – 'Accio!' – and it zoomed gloomily back into his hand.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix - chapter 18






"Reckon there's salmon, or is it too early in the season? Accio Salmon!"
There were several distinct splashes and then the slapping sounds of fish against flesh. Somebody grunted appreciatively.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - chapter 15






There are a few other instances of animals being summoned indirectly or unsuccessfully, such as Newt summoning the Niffler by summoning the jewelry in its pouch, or Harry failing to summon Hagrid and Hedwig during the Battle of the Seven Potters (which I think we can put down to Harry's inexperience with the charm; even when he summoned his Firebolt, he had been practicing just before he managed it, and the charm gets harder with range). I'd also give an honorary mention to Ron for "Accio Brain!".


But, what gives? Is there any possible explanation for the inconsistency in the ability of this charm to summon animals?



Answer




Though it’s true that there’s an inconsistency in that JKR said that creatures can’t be summoned by Accio, instances of it happening are clearly seen in both the books and the Fantastic Beasts movies, which JKR’s statement was referring to. Since it’s actually seen as happening in both the books and Fantastic Beasts, it’s clearly shown as true that Accio works on creatures, and is safe for the creatures being Summoned, since Trevor is unharmed.



“I’m almost certain of it,’ said Hermione grimly. ‘Watch your frog, it’s escaping.’


Harry pointed his wand at the bullfrog that had been hopping hopefully towards the other side of the table – ‘Accio!’ – and it zoomed gloomily back into his hand.”
- Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Chapter 18 (Dumbledore’s Army)




In Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, the sequel to the movie JKR is referring to when she says creatures can’t be summoned safely by Accio, Newt Summons his Niffler.



NEWT
Accio Niffler!


The case bursts open and a Niffler jumps out.


NEWT
Get looking.


NEWT climbs onto the case and inspects impressions of creatures revealed in the air, while the now-trained adult Niffler sniffs out clues.
- Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (The Original Screenplay)




Since it’s undeniably seen as happening in both the books and the Fantastic Beasts movies, it’s clearly incorrect to say Summoning creatures with Accio is impossible.



Within the books and the Fantastic Beasts movies themselves, there’s no contradiction - creatures are summoned with Accio, and at no point is this said to not be possible. Therefore, the more logical thing would be to simply consider the statement by JKR and the information in Wonderbook saying creatures can’t be summoned by Accio incorrect, as in-universe, it’s clearly shown as false.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

fan fiction - Does the Interdict of Merlin appear in original Harry Potter canon?

In Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality by Eliezer Yudkowsky a concept called the ' Interdict of Merlin ' appears: (all emphasis added) Chapter 23: His hand on the doorknob, Harry Potter already inside and waiting, wearing his cowled cloak. "The ancient first-year spells," Harry Potter said. "What did you find?" "They're no more powerful than the spells we use now." Harry Potter's fist struck a desk, hard. "Damn it. All right. My own experiment was a failure, Draco. There's something called the Interdict of Merlin -" Draco hit himself on the forehead, realizing. "- which stops anyone from getting knowledge of powerful spells out of books, even if you find and read a powerful wizard's notes they won't make sense to you, it has to go from one living mind to another. I couldn't find any powerful spells that we had the instructions for but couldn't cast. But if you can't get them out of old books,

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir