Skip to main content

star wars - Why did the stormtroopers care about hiding the fact that they killed the Jawas?


In Episode IV, why did the stormtroopers spend time making Bantha tracks and dropping gaffe sticks just to hide their killing of the Jawas?


I know that it shows off Obi-Wan's Sherlock Holmes wit but it seems like something the stormtroopers wouldn't care about.


So why did they bother?



Answer




In the movie, the whole chain of events starts with Empire troops under command of Darth Vader attacking Leia's ship, Tantive IV, and taking her prisoner.


Since the Senate still exists at that point and apparently has to be reckoned with, it's a scandal ready to erupt. A Senator has been taken by force, some of her entourage killed, and no direct evidence of her involvement with the Rebels obtained. Other Senators won't like that (what if they are next?), and they have political influence.


So some subordinate of Vader brings it to his attention, and Vader orders to cover everything up (as seen in ANH), because he doesn't want any interference or delays:



Leia is marched away down the hallway and into the smoldering hole blasted in the side of the ship. An Imperial Commander turns to Vader.


COMMANDER: Holding her is dangerous. If word of this gets out, it could generate sympathy for the Rebellion in the senate.


VADER: I have traced the Rebel spies to her. Now she is my only link to find their secret base!


COMMANDER: She'll die before she tells you anything.


VADER: Leave that to me. Send a distress signal and then inform the senate that all aboard were killed!




When Vader says that all aboard were killed, the Imperials either don't leave any living beings to tell otherwise or get Force choked. After such measures taken on Tantive IV, the landing party also has to cover up its actions. I know of no canon proof for this, but it's very likely that such orders have been given - why only hide half of the troublesome things? To anyone except few trusted by Vader, it must look like the whole skirmish has never happened. Which means, none of the people they find and question while trailing the escaped droids may talk to anyone about that. It's simply too strange to meet with stormtroopers in the middle of the Tatooine desert (where the Imperial military normally doesn't go at all), and the questions about some special droids with special data inside them don't help. Rumors can start spreading, and unwelcome questions can arise. If somebody comes looking for missing Alderaanian Princess, such a trail can be noticed and traced back.


And wouldn't it be so convenient if all those witnesses just died in an unfortunate accident involving some locals (well known to be aggressive), totally unrelated to any Empire representative, of course.


(This approach is unlikely to work on Mos Eisley scale, but stormtroopers are less strange when seen there, and they don't have to ask any detailed questions when looking for droids, so there's no need to eliminate witnesses anymore).


Without the initial events on the Tantive IV, there would unlikely be any need to cover up the murder of jawas. The stormtroopers could simply act as legitimate Imperial law enforcers. They could even kill jawas (as) if those resisted detaining and questioning, and nobody in the Empire would be held responsible.


Summary of TL;DR: because of the brute force use against Leia Organa, the political clout of the Senate could lead to something unwanted, so everything traceable to that has been covered up, with Vader's blessing, the witnesses have been killed, and those murders have also been covered up.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

tolkiens legendarium - Did Gandalf wear his Ring of Power throughout the trilogy?

After Gandalf discovered that Sauron was back and sent Frodo on his quest to Rivendell, did he continue to wear Narya (one of the Three Rings)? It seems like a huge risk to continue to wear it after the Nazgûl (Ringwraiths) started to try and reclaim the One Ring; if they managed to get the ring to Sauron, couldn't he be corrupted by his power? Whatever powers Narya bestows upon him couldn't possibly be worth the huge risk, could it? Answer When Sauron forged the one ring and put it on his finger, the other ring bearers were immediately aware of him and his intentions and removed their own rings. There is no reason why they couldn't merely do so again. As soon as Sauron set the One Ring upon his finger they were aware of him; and they knew him, and preceived that he would be master of them, and of all they wrought. Then in anger and fear they took off their rings. "Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age," Silmarillion