Skip to main content

tolkiens legendarium - Why did Gandalf go out of time?


Given that the Ainur, like the Elves were bound to the universe as long as it lasted, only men being able to escape (the gift of men), why on the death of his Earthly form did Gandalf leave time and get sent back by Eru, rather than simply travel to the Halls of Mandos for healing and reclothing in valinor?



'Naked I was sent back- for a brief time, until my task is done'. Sent back by whom, and whence? Not by the 'gods' whose business is only with this embodied world and its time; for he passed 'out of thought and time'. Naked is alas! unclear. It was meant just literally, 'unclothed like a child' (not disincarnate), and so ready to receive the white robes of the highest. Galadriel's power is not divine, and his healing in Lorien is meant to be no more than physical healing and refreshment." [The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, (#156)]





Answer



We don't know precisely, but it was related to his embodiment.


Death in Middle-earth


In Tolkien's legendarium, death has a very particular meaning: it's the severance of the spirit (fëa) and body (hröa). This is true of both Elves and Men; in fact, without special knowledge, the death of an Elf looks identical to the death of a Man:



[I]n the days when the minds of the Eldalië were young, and not yet fully awake death among them seemed to differ little from the death of Men.


[...]


It was in Aman that they learned of Manwë that each fëa was imperishable within the life of Arda, and that its fate was to inhabit Arda to its end.


History of Middle-earth X Morgoth's Ring Part 2 "The Second Phase" Chapter 3: "Laws and Customs Among the Eldar" Of Death and the Severance of Fëa and Hröndo [> Hröa]




Of course this definition doesn't make sense when discussing beings like the Maiar, because their bodies aren't critical parts of their being:



[T]heir shape comes of their knowledge of the visible World, rather than of the World itself; and they need it not, save only as we use raiment, and yet we may be naked and suffer no loss of our being.


The Silmarillion I Ainulindalë



So when we say that the Valar and Maiar can't die, that's what we mean.


What about the Istari?


The wizards were different:



For with the consent of Eru they [the Valar] sent members of their own high order, but clad in bodies of as of Men, real and not feigned, but subject to the fears and pains and weariness of earth, able to hunger and thirst and be slain; though because of their noble spirits they did not die, and aged only by the cares and labours of many long years.



Unfinished Tales Part 4 Chapter II: The Istari



He phrases this differently in Letter 156:



By 'incarnate' I mean [the Istari] were embodied in physical bodies capable of pain, and weariness, and of afflicting the spirit with physical fear, and of being 'killed', though supported by the angelic spirit they might endure long, and only show slowly the wearing of care and labour.


The Letters of J.R.R> Tolkien 156: To Robert Murray, SJ (Draft). 4 November 1954



The explicit identification of Gandalf as an "incarnate" is interesting, because that's what Elves and Men are. The implication, then, is that the angelic spirit of Olórin the Maia was somehow tethered to the body of Gandalf. The precise mechanics of how this works is unclear, and we don't have a good idea of what would have happened to Olórin if Gandalf had not been resurrected, but there is something fundamentally different between the two beings. Death means something different to Gandalf than to Olórin, though we don't know what.


Okay, so why did Gandalf leave Eä?


This may be a controversial opinion, but I don't think he did. Consider how Gandalf describes his death:




I threw down my enemy, and he fell from the high place and broke the mountain-side where he smote it in his ruin. Then darkness took me; and I strayed out of thought and time, and I wandered far on roads that I will not tell.


The Two Towers Book III Chapter 5: "The White Rider"



When people suggest that Gandalf left Eä upon his death, they usually point to the line "I strayed out of thought and time"1. However, I find it interesting how the word "time" is spelt: it's not capitalized. Now consider two excerpts from The Silmarillion:



Vairë the Weaver is [Mandos'] spouse, who weaves all things that have ever been in Time into her storied webs, and the halls of Mandos that ever widen as the ages pass are clothed with them.


The Silmarillion II Valaquenta



And:




[T]he sons of Men die indeed, and leave the world; wherefore they are called the Guests, or the Strangers. Death is their fate, the gift of Ilúvatar, which as Time wears even the Powers shall envy.


The Silmarillion III Quenta Silmarillion Chapter 1: "Of the Beginning of Days"



Note how "time" is capitalized here. It seems to me that "Time", in Tolkien, is a reference to the material universe; thus I submit that there's a difference between Gandalf saying "I strayed out of thought and time" and "I strayed out of thought and Time." I don't think it's a coincidence that he chose the former.


Finally, consider the death of Saruman:



To the dismay of those that stood by, about the body of Saruman a grey mist gathered, and rising slowly to a great height like smoke from a fire, as a pale shrouded figure it loomed over the Hill. For a moment it wavered, looking to the West; but out of the West came a cold wind, and it bent away, and with a sigh dissolved into nothing.


Return of the King Book VI Chapter 8: "The Scouring of the Shire"




Since Gandalf and Saruman are the same class of being (incarnate angels, as Tolkien puts it), presumably the rules governing what "death" means to them are similar. Indeed, the main difference between their deaths are the circumstances. And the implication given by Saruman's death is that he wanted to return to Valinor2, but was forbidden, most likely due to his many failures as an agent of the Valar.


So, to (finally) answer the question: why did Gandalf leave the universe when he died?


I don't think he did.




1 You could perhaps also make a case for "I wandered far on roads that I will not tell", but I don't find that particularly compelling. Gandalf is vague throughout telling his story, and ascribing special meaning to one instance of vagueness seems troubling to me.


2 Indeed, Tolkien says that the desire to return home was a principle motivator of all Istari:



[T]hough they knew whence they came the memory of the Blessed Realm was to them a vision from afar off, for which (so long as they remained true to their mission) they yearned exceedingly. Thus by enduring of free will the pangs of exile and the deceits of Sauron they might redress the evils of that time.


Unfinished Tales Part 4 Chapter II: The Istari




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

fan fiction - Does the Interdict of Merlin appear in original Harry Potter canon?

In Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality by Eliezer Yudkowsky a concept called the ' Interdict of Merlin ' appears: (all emphasis added) Chapter 23: His hand on the doorknob, Harry Potter already inside and waiting, wearing his cowled cloak. "The ancient first-year spells," Harry Potter said. "What did you find?" "They're no more powerful than the spells we use now." Harry Potter's fist struck a desk, hard. "Damn it. All right. My own experiment was a failure, Draco. There's something called the Interdict of Merlin -" Draco hit himself on the forehead, realizing. "- which stops anyone from getting knowledge of powerful spells out of books, even if you find and read a powerful wizard's notes they won't make sense to you, it has to go from one living mind to another. I couldn't find any powerful spells that we had the instructions for but couldn't cast. But if you can't get them out of old books,

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir