Skip to main content

communication - Why didn't Sirius remind Harry about the mirror when he used Umbridge's fireplace?


I understand from this answer why not-so-bright Harry didn't understand the true usefulness or significance of the two-way mirror until it was too late. This was basically because Sirius described it to him as an emergency method of contacting him if and only if Snape was giving him a hard time.



"What is it?" Harry asked.
"A way of letting me know if Snape's giving you a hard time. No, don't open it in here!" said Sirius, with a wary look at Mrs Weasley, who was trying to persuade the twins to wear hand-knitted mittens. "I doubt Molly would approve - but I want you to use it if you need me, all right?"
"OK," said Harry, stowing the package away in the inside pocket of his jacket, but he knew he would never use whatever it was. It would not be he, Harry, who lured Sirius from his place of safety, no matter how foully Snape treated him in their forthcoming Occlumency classes.
(Order of the Pheonix, Chapter 24, Occlumency)




Here we can see that Harry is worried about Sirius' increasing recklessness. But he also doesn't understand that the mirror will work as a general communication device. So when he wants to contact Sirius for other reasons - to talk about the Pensieve and to enquire as to Sirius' whereabouts - later in the book he thinks that the only way to talk to Sirius is to use Umbridge's fireplace.


Harry thinks this but Sirius knows better. Why didn't Sirius ask Harry why he wasn't using the mirror that Sirius had given him for the exact purpose of getting in touch? Surely he should have been bewildered as to why Harry was using the much more risky method of Floo powder? Is there a good reason why Sirius didn't effectively say, "Let's continue this conversation using the mirrors?". Obviously hindsight is a wonderful thing but it would have saved a lot of trouble later on.



Answer



We can't really know why Sirius did not ask Harry why he was not using the mirror, but I can think of a few ideas:




  1. First, Sirius did not know that Harry had broken into Umbridge's office to contact him. Harry did not mention whose fireplace he was using.


    One might imagine that Sirius would have assumed that Umbridge was watching the fireplaces from his earlier experience:




    “Oh . . .” said Sirius, frowning. “Well, I’ll have a think and get back to —” He broke off. His face was suddenly tense, alarmed. He turned sideways, apparently looking into the solid brick wall of the fireplace.


    Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix



    However, as Hermione said in response to that incident:



    "Umbridge has been reading your mail, Harry. There’s no other explanation.”


    Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix



    Umbridge most likely had seen the time Sirius was meeting Harry in one of his letters. Later, of course, she set someone to watch all the fireplaces, but it is debatable whether Sirius knew this:




    "A Floo Network Regulator is keeping watch over every fire in Hogwarts — except my own, of course."


    Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix



    So there would not have been any reason for Sirius to assume that Harry was not using, say, the Gryffindor common room fireplace, and that (not having informed Umbridge) he was perfectly safe in doing so. Thus asking about the mirror would not have been a particularly high priority (particularly given how involved Harry was in the conversation).




  2. Sirius may have assumed (from the position of someone very familiar with the wizarding world) that Harry would already have opened and recognized the mirror, and was thus choosing to use the fireplace for considered reasons. Again, given that Sirius had little reason to think that their communications were unsafe, he would not have particularly cared which form of communication Harry used.



  3. Sirius may just not have thought of it. It was a short conversation (under twenty minutes), and they had a lot to talk about.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...