Skip to main content

communication - Why didn't Sirius remind Harry about the mirror when he used Umbridge's fireplace?


I understand from this answer why not-so-bright Harry didn't understand the true usefulness or significance of the two-way mirror until it was too late. This was basically because Sirius described it to him as an emergency method of contacting him if and only if Snape was giving him a hard time.



"What is it?" Harry asked.
"A way of letting me know if Snape's giving you a hard time. No, don't open it in here!" said Sirius, with a wary look at Mrs Weasley, who was trying to persuade the twins to wear hand-knitted mittens. "I doubt Molly would approve - but I want you to use it if you need me, all right?"
"OK," said Harry, stowing the package away in the inside pocket of his jacket, but he knew he would never use whatever it was. It would not be he, Harry, who lured Sirius from his place of safety, no matter how foully Snape treated him in their forthcoming Occlumency classes.
(Order of the Pheonix, Chapter 24, Occlumency)




Here we can see that Harry is worried about Sirius' increasing recklessness. But he also doesn't understand that the mirror will work as a general communication device. So when he wants to contact Sirius for other reasons - to talk about the Pensieve and to enquire as to Sirius' whereabouts - later in the book he thinks that the only way to talk to Sirius is to use Umbridge's fireplace.


Harry thinks this but Sirius knows better. Why didn't Sirius ask Harry why he wasn't using the mirror that Sirius had given him for the exact purpose of getting in touch? Surely he should have been bewildered as to why Harry was using the much more risky method of Floo powder? Is there a good reason why Sirius didn't effectively say, "Let's continue this conversation using the mirrors?". Obviously hindsight is a wonderful thing but it would have saved a lot of trouble later on.



Answer



We can't really know why Sirius did not ask Harry why he was not using the mirror, but I can think of a few ideas:




  1. First, Sirius did not know that Harry had broken into Umbridge's office to contact him. Harry did not mention whose fireplace he was using.


    One might imagine that Sirius would have assumed that Umbridge was watching the fireplaces from his earlier experience:




    “Oh . . .” said Sirius, frowning. “Well, I’ll have a think and get back to —” He broke off. His face was suddenly tense, alarmed. He turned sideways, apparently looking into the solid brick wall of the fireplace.


    —Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix



    However, as Hermione said in response to that incident:



    "Umbridge has been reading your mail, Harry. There’s no other explanation.”


    —Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix



    Umbridge most likely had seen the time Sirius was meeting Harry in one of his letters. Later, of course, she set someone to watch all the fireplaces, but it is debatable whether Sirius knew this:




    "A Floo Network Regulator is keeping watch over every fire in Hogwarts — except my own, of course."


    —Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix



    So there would not have been any reason for Sirius to assume that Harry was not using, say, the Gryffindor common room fireplace, and that (not having informed Umbridge) he was perfectly safe in doing so. Thus asking about the mirror would not have been a particularly high priority (particularly given how involved Harry was in the conversation).




  2. Sirius may have assumed (from the position of someone very familiar with the wizarding world) that Harry would already have opened and recognized the mirror, and was thus choosing to use the fireplace for considered reasons. Again, given that Sirius had little reason to think that their communications were unsafe, he would not have particularly cared which form of communication Harry used.



  3. Sirius may just not have thought of it. It was a short conversation (under twenty minutes), and they had a lot to talk about.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...