Skip to main content

harry potter - How can McGonagall make sandwiches appear?



According to Hermione in DH, food is one of the Five Exceptions to Gamp's Law on Transfiguration.


Yet, in CoS, Professor McGonagall is able to give Harry and Ron a plate on which sandwiches appear continously. One can object that some sandwiches cannot be considered as food, but they still are. The same can be said about Molly Weasley making sauce from her wand in GoF while grumbling about how the twins abuse magic.


Is there any canon explanation on how McGonagall and Mrs Weasley created food from nowhere?


By canon, I mean anything coming from the books, Pottermore, or JKR quotes.




Answer



McGonagall doesn't create the sandwiches with magic, and neither does the plate. She essentially summons/displaces a plate from the Kitchens or Great Hall, which is magically linked with identical plates in the Kitchens. The House Elves make the sandwiches, place them on the plate in the Kitchens, and then they're magically transported to the paired plate elsewhere (usually on the tables in the Great Hall).


There's a description of the kitchens in Goblet of Fire, Chapter 21 - The House-Elf Liberation Front:



he [Dobby] seized Harry’s hand and pulled him off into the kitchen between the four long wooden tables that stood there. Each of these tables, Harry noticed as he passed them, was positioned exactly beneath the four House tables above, in the Great Hall. At the moment, they were clear of food, dinner having finished, but he supposed that an hour ago they had been laden with dishes that were then sent up through the ceiling to their counterparts above.




As far as Mrs. Weasley's wand producing sauce, I really don't know how that works. That happens in Goblet of Fire, and Gamp's Law of Elemental Transfiguration doesn't appear to be mentioned until Deathly Hallows (three books later). Here's what Hermione says about it:



“Your mother can’t produce food out of thin air,” said Hermione. “no one can. Food is the first of the five Principal Exceptions to Gamp’s Law of Elemental Transfigura—”



“Oh, speak English, can’t you?” Ron said, prising a fish out from between his teeth.


“It’s impossible to make good food out of nothing! You can Summon it if you know where it is, you can transform it, you can increase the quantity if you’ve already got some—”



It could just be a case of JKR being inconsistent, and not having thought up Gamp's Law of Elemental Transfiguration (and its exceptions) prior to that point. Not being able to magic up food was important to the plot (it was one of the things that created tension between the trio) during Deathly Hallows, but hadn't been at any point before that since they'd always been at Hogwarts eating (usually) three meals a day.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....
Post a Comment
Read more

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...
Post a Comment
Read more