Skip to main content

harry potter - Could a muggle see a thestral?


As we learn in the books:




“The only people who can see thestrals,” [Luna] said, “are people who have seen death.”


— Order of the Phoenix, chapter 21 (The Eye of the Snake)



Muggles see, and are touched by, death just as often as wizards would be. Now, the first step to seeing a thestral is being near one. But during the course of the Harry Potter books thestrals were flying over London several times.


In fact, there are two thestrals walking around Privet Drive prior to the Battle of the Seven Potters. Fleur Delacour with Bill Weasley, and Hermione Granger with Kingsley Shacklebolt both left on thestrals and they were all inside for several minutes while the steed were out front. Given that Little Whinging isn't a wizard enclave it is certainly possible someone saw them.


So given that, is it possible for a muggle to see a thestral if they have “seen death”?



Answer



I would say yes.


Three pieces of supporting evidence:





  1. Using Thestrals for transport is a serious breach of the Statute of Secrecy.


    From the first WOMBAT (transcript on HP Lexicon), if we assume that it isn’t a trick question, then we learn that Thestrals can’t be used for transport:



    Which of the following unorthodox means of transportation is considered the most serious breach of the International Statue [sic] of Secrecy?


    a. Thestrals
    b. Abraxan horse-drawn giant carriage
    c. Hippogriff
    d. Flying Muggle vehicle (eg, car, motorcycle)

    e. Underwater ship



    Using Thestrals to fly is only a risk if somebody can actually see the Thestral or its rider. Since this is being held up as a potentially serious breach of secrecy, I think it means that Muggles would have some chance of seeing the Thestral.


    (As you point out, Harry et al used Thestrals to reach the Ministry in Order, then they were used again to escort Harry in Hallows. So why weren’t they arrested for the latter?)




  2. It sounds like their owners are required to hide them in Muggle-populated areas.


    Thestrals are a breed of winged horse, whose entry in Fantastic Beasts reads:



    Winged horses exist worldwide. There are many different breeds, including […] the rare Thestral (black, possessed of the power of invisibility and considered unlucky by many wizards). As with the Hippogriff, the owner of a winged horse is required to perform a Disillusionment Charm upon it at regular intervals.




    If Thestrals were truly invisible to Muggles, then there would be no need to cast Disillusionment Charms upon them. Since no exception is mentioned for Thestrals, we may assume that any Muggle who has seen death can also see Thestrals.




  3. J.K. Rowling can see Thestrals.


    She was asked this in an interview after the publication of Order of the Phoenix:



    In the fifth book, Harry can see the Thestrals. Can you?


    Yes, I can, definitely.


    — J.K. Rowling at the Edinburgh Book Festival (August 2004)




    Since J.K. Rowling is a Muggle[citation-needed] and does not mention any special case for Muggles, or indicate that one exists, we must assume that Muggles really can see Thestrals.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...