Skip to main content

harry potter - Why are wizards often unable to cast spells with the first try?


In "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone", out of the whole class, Hermione is the only one who can levitate a feather. Also, in "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix", Dumbledore's Army is practicing various spells, many of them failing again and again.


If they're wizards and witches, if magic is a part of their being, then why do they have to try so many times before they can successfully cast a spell?



Answer



In the case of book 1 and Flitwick's Charms class - they are essentially learning a new language - a language with an emphasis on tone and inflection - much like Mandarin Chinese.


For example - from book 1:




"And saying the magic words properly is very important too - never forget Wizard Baruffio, who said 's' instead of 'f' and found himself on the floor with a buffalo on his chest." [Flitwick]


'You're saying it wrong', Harry heard Hermione snap. 'It's Wing-gar-dium Levi-o-sa, make the 'gar' nice and long'



Consider the word 'ma' in Mandarin:


By saying the two letters 'ma' together with varying inflection, you get 5 different meanings:


Mother - High and level - 1st tone


To bother - Rising from middle to high - 2nd tone


Horse - First falling then rising - 3rd tone


To scold - Falling from high - 4th tone



ma An interrogative particle - Brief and soft - Neutral


source - http://www.learnnc.org/lp/editions/mandarin1/4480


To anyone unfamiliar with the tonal language, somebody saying 'ma' with any of the 5 inflections may not notice the difference and just hear 'ma' but to somebody with an understanding of the language, there are distinct differences in meaning.


The same principle can clearly be applied to charms work given both Hermione and Flitwick's statements. It isn't enough to just say the words, you have to say them correctly. Factor in regional dialects (Seamus Finnigan comes to mind ;), possible speech or physical defects (tongue-tied, dental issues, etc...) and one can suppose that 11 year-olds may not get things perfectly the first or second time


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...