Skip to main content

harry potter - Why would Charlie Weasley give up his old wand and give it to Ron?


In Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 6, Ron says:



You never get anything new either, with five brothers. I've got Bill's old robes, Charlie's old wand and Percy's old rat.



What I don't understand is why Charlie would give up his wand to get a new one. Since the wand chooses its owner, his original wand was already an excellent fit for him, and I seem to recall that a wand grows in power the longer it is in the possession of its owner.



The most common reason we see for wizards getting a new wand is that the old one is broken. But the wand was perfectly intact when Ron had it (before the Whomping Willow incident anyway). And as far as I can tell, there was nothing else deficient about the wand.


So if Charlie had a perfectly good wand that was already in tune with him and would become better as he continued to use it, why would he give it up and give a different wand?



Answer




But the wand was perfectly intact when Ron had it (before the Whomping Willow incident anyway). And as far as I can tell, there was nothing else deficient about the wand.



I wouldn’t quite agree with that.


The very first time we actually see the wand (not when Ron describes it, but a bit later on the same train ride when he tries to turn Scabbers yellow), it’s described thus:



He rummaged around in his trunk and pulled out a very battered-looking wand. It was chipped in places and something white was glinting at the end.



‘Unicorn hair’s nearly poking out. Anyway –’



That doesn’t sound like a wand in mint condition to me. Knowing Charlie’s temper and future job, I can imagine him not being the Cedric Diggory type of guy who’d take brilliant care of his wand and keep it in pristine condition—he’d be more likely to have some fun with it, to the point where it’s in… well, the condition described in the book.


The wand never does work particularly well for Ron, either, even though family ties help hand-me-down wands perform better than non-family wands.


My guess is simply that Charlie’s old wand (perhaps even a hand-me-down for him as well, originally) was getting battered and a bit long in the tooth and wasn’t performing very well for him anymore, so when he got his fancy dragon job in Romania—where a functioning and up-to-speed wand is likely quite crucial, given what he’s working with—he or his parents (or indeed, as Nacht notes in the comment below, his employers) coughed up the Galleons needed to get him a newer one.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...