Skip to main content

the lord of the rings - Why didn't Isildur's Heir come forward sooner?


In Appendix A: Annals of the Kings and Rulers, we learn some things about Aragorn's family tree. There are basically two facts that together are confusing me:



  1. The Kingdom of Arnor comes to an end in TA 1975 after the Dúnedain are basically wiped out battling the forces of Angmar. But the line survives in Aranarth, Aragorn's great-to-the-power-of-thirteen-grandfather.

  2. The line of the Kings of Gondor comes to an end in TA 2050, when Eärnur dies with no sons and they can't find a pure-blooded Dúnedain to rule after him.


However, Aranarth is alive at this time (He doesn't die until 2106, meaning he's as good a candidate as any to take the throne of Gondor. So why doesn't he?


Showing my work a bit, the Appendix does give a partial answer. In 1944 the King and both his sons are killed in battle, and history tells us:




On the death of kind Ondoher and his sons, Arvedui of the North-kingdom claimed the crown of Gondor, as the direct descendant of Isildur, and as the husband of Fíriel, only surviving child of Ondoher. The claim was rejected. In this Pelendur, the Steward of Kind Ondoher, player the chief part.
[Arvedui objects to this on the grounds that he's still descended in direct line from Elendil]
To this Gondor made no answer. The crown was claimed by Eärnil, the victorious captain; and it was granted to him with the approval of all the Dúnedain in Gondor [...] Arvedui did not press his claim; for he had neither the power nor the will to oppose the choice of the Dúnedain of Gondor; yet the claim was never forgotten by his descendants even when their kingship had passed away.



So, okay. Maybe Aranarth (The son of Arvedui) doesn't come forward because he holds a bit of a grudge, or because he figures they'll reject him again. Fair enough.


But there are nine hundred years between when Eärnur dies and Aragorn takes the throne. For all of that time, we know that Gondor expects a King to return, and not just Eärnur himself:



Each new Steward indeed took office with the oath 'to hold rod and rule in the name of the king, until he shall return'. But these soon became words of ritual little heeded, for the Stewards exercised all the power of the kings. Yet many in Gondor still believed that a king would indeed return in some time to come; and some remembered the ancient line of the North, which it was rumoured still lived on in the shadows.



So everybody knows that Gondor is waiting for a King, and apparently the only people who don't know that the Northern Line is still alive and kicking is Gondor herself. So why, in those (again) nine hundred years, did one of them not come forward to claim the throne?




Answer



A hint is given in LotR Appendix A, the tale of Aragorn and Arwen, when discussing Aragorn's youth and upbringing in Rivendell:



...his true name and lineage were kept secret at the bidding of Elrond; for the Wise then knew that the Enemy was seeking to discover the Heir of Isildur, if any remained upon earth.



This shows that Isildur's heir was being kept hidden by Elrond in order to protect and conceal him from Sauron, and there's no reason to suppose that what was true for Aragorn wasn't also true for his ancestors.


In the Tale of Years we see that the timing is right; although the White Council didn't confirm for certain that Sauron had returned until TA 2850, they had begun to suspect it as early as TA 2060 (Gandalf made his first visit to Dol Guldur in TA 2063), which was just shortly after the loss of Earnur.


You should also note that Aragorn's decision to reveal himself as Isildur's heir and claim the kingship wasn't a case of just waking up one morning and deciding he'd like to be king; it was a very specific set of circumstances:



But now the world is changing once again. A new hour comes. Isildur's Bane is found. Battle is at hand. The Sword shall be reforged. I will come to Minas Tirith. (the Council of Elrond)




In other words: the decision to come out of hiding was forced on him by the potential pending disaster at the end of the Third Age.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

tolkiens legendarium - Did Gandalf wear his Ring of Power throughout the trilogy?

After Gandalf discovered that Sauron was back and sent Frodo on his quest to Rivendell, did he continue to wear Narya (one of the Three Rings)? It seems like a huge risk to continue to wear it after the Nazgûl (Ringwraiths) started to try and reclaim the One Ring; if they managed to get the ring to Sauron, couldn't he be corrupted by his power? Whatever powers Narya bestows upon him couldn't possibly be worth the huge risk, could it? Answer When Sauron forged the one ring and put it on his finger, the other ring bearers were immediately aware of him and his intentions and removed their own rings. There is no reason why they couldn't merely do so again. As soon as Sauron set the One Ring upon his finger they were aware of him; and they knew him, and preceived that he would be master of them, and of all they wrought. Then in anger and fear they took off their rings. "Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age," Silmarillion