Skip to main content

harry potter - Who is Gilderoy Lockhart based on?


J.K. Rowling has stated that Gilderoy Lockhart is the only character in the Harry Potter series who is based on a real person she knows.




Are any of your characters based on real people?


The only character who is deliberately based on a real person is Gilderoy Lockhart. [Laughter]. Maybe he is not the one that you would think of, but I have to say that the living model was worse. [Laughter]. He was a shocker! The lies that he told about adventures that he’d had, things he’d done and impressive acts that he had committed… He was a shocking man. I can say this quite freely because he will never in a million years dream that he is Gilderoy Lockhart. I am always frightened that he is going to turn up one day. He is just one of those people from your past whom you feel you have never quite shaken off. I will look up one day at a signing and he will say, “Hello, Jo”. [Laughter]. Other people have contributed the odd characteristic, such as a nose, to a character, but the only character who I sat down and thought that I would base on someone is Gilderoy Lockhart. It made up for having to endure him for two solid years.


J.K. Rowling at the Edinburgh Book Festival, in response to a question from the audience, through Accio Quote.



I've read some speculation that it is her ex-husband, Jorge Arantes.



(...) Jorge Arantes, a dashing journalism student three years her junior.


(...)


Maria Ines Augiar believed Jorge to be both possessive and jealous, while Steve Cassidy, who ran the school where Rowling worked, viewed him as rough and untrustworthy.


"The JK Rowling story", The Scotsman, June 16th, 2003.




They were married from October 1992 to November 1993, while having met only a couple of months before their wedding, so that's a year and a half at best, not the two years J.K. said she had to endure in her answer. But other characteristics seem to match.
And Hermione, who is generally accepted as an author insertion, does have a crush on Lockhart before he is exposed.


But



She told how the Daily Express wrongly claimed she based "unpleasant" Potter character Gilderoy Lockhart on her ex-husband Jorge Arantes. It was based on a former flatmate.


"JK Rowling tells Leveson inquiry of her struggles with fame", Daily Mirror, November 25th, 2011



So who is it?



Answer




Definitely not her husband. All we know is that they were once flatmates.


This is J.K. Rowling’s witness statement to the Leveson Inquiry (an inquiry into the standards of the British press) which the Mirror is referring to:



Defamation: private life


The press have also published false allegations related to my private life. In 2004 the Daily Express published an article saying that one of the “slimiest” characters in Harry Potter was based on my ex-husband and that I had admitted basing arrogant wizard, Gilderoy Lockhart on him as an act of revenge. It was even stated in some of the articles that I was prepared to abuse my position as an author in order to humiliate my ex-husband by making this revelation to a national newspaper. [...] It was remarkable to see the Daily Express changing their headline throughout the course of the day as later editions that same day carried a different heading. This showed that they were aware that such allegations were totally false. [...] The article had been falsely based on a light-hearted talk I gave once to a group of children at the Edinburgh Book Festival. I did not reveal anyone’s true identity when discussing the inspiration for the character. An apology was printed.



Her full witness statement can be read on the Guardian website; this comes on page 30 of 33.


(Strictly speaking, the allegation is that she admitted basing Lockhart on her husband, not that she actually did.)


The Edinburgh Book Festival is presumably the same one you quoted in the question; I haven’t checked the publication date of the Express article.


Given that the Express retracted the claim, and she refuted it while under oath, we can assume it really wasn’t her husband.



As for the flatmate claim, the Huffington Post has a quote from the inquiry to back this up:



“I said humorously the character was Gilderoy Lockhart was based on someone I had lived with briefly,” she says. “That's true, but this person can’t probably even remember we were flatmates.”



I would not expect her to describe her ex-husband as somebody she lived with “briefly”, or as unlikely to remember that they lived together.


I’m not aware of any other details of who Lockhart was based on. For obvious reasons, she doesn’t talk about him much.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...