Skip to main content

harry potter - Who is Gilderoy Lockhart based on?


J.K. Rowling has stated that Gilderoy Lockhart is the only character in the Harry Potter series who is based on a real person she knows.




Are any of your characters based on real people?


The only character who is deliberately based on a real person is Gilderoy Lockhart. [Laughter]. Maybe he is not the one that you would think of, but I have to say that the living model was worse. [Laughter]. He was a shocker! The lies that he told about adventures that he’d had, things he’d done and impressive acts that he had committed… He was a shocking man. I can say this quite freely because he will never in a million years dream that he is Gilderoy Lockhart. I am always frightened that he is going to turn up one day. He is just one of those people from your past whom you feel you have never quite shaken off. I will look up one day at a signing and he will say, “Hello, Jo”. [Laughter]. Other people have contributed the odd characteristic, such as a nose, to a character, but the only character who I sat down and thought that I would base on someone is Gilderoy Lockhart. It made up for having to endure him for two solid years.


J.K. Rowling at the Edinburgh Book Festival, in response to a question from the audience, through Accio Quote.



I've read some speculation that it is her ex-husband, Jorge Arantes.



(...) Jorge Arantes, a dashing journalism student three years her junior.


(...)


Maria Ines Augiar believed Jorge to be both possessive and jealous, while Steve Cassidy, who ran the school where Rowling worked, viewed him as rough and untrustworthy.


"The JK Rowling story", The Scotsman, June 16th, 2003.




They were married from October 1992 to November 1993, while having met only a couple of months before their wedding, so that's a year and a half at best, not the two years J.K. said she had to endure in her answer. But other characteristics seem to match.
And Hermione, who is generally accepted as an author insertion, does have a crush on Lockhart before he is exposed.


But



She told how the Daily Express wrongly claimed she based "unpleasant" Potter character Gilderoy Lockhart on her ex-husband Jorge Arantes. It was based on a former flatmate.


"JK Rowling tells Leveson inquiry of her struggles with fame", Daily Mirror, November 25th, 2011



So who is it?



Answer




Definitely not her husband. All we know is that they were once flatmates.


This is J.K. Rowling’s witness statement to the Leveson Inquiry (an inquiry into the standards of the British press) which the Mirror is referring to:



Defamation: private life


The press have also published false allegations related to my private life. In 2004 the Daily Express published an article saying that one of the “slimiest” characters in Harry Potter was based on my ex-husband and that I had admitted basing arrogant wizard, Gilderoy Lockhart on him as an act of revenge. It was even stated in some of the articles that I was prepared to abuse my position as an author in order to humiliate my ex-husband by making this revelation to a national newspaper. [...] It was remarkable to see the Daily Express changing their headline throughout the course of the day as later editions that same day carried a different heading. This showed that they were aware that such allegations were totally false. [...] The article had been falsely based on a light-hearted talk I gave once to a group of children at the Edinburgh Book Festival. I did not reveal anyone’s true identity when discussing the inspiration for the character. An apology was printed.



Her full witness statement can be read on the Guardian website; this comes on page 30 of 33.


(Strictly speaking, the allegation is that she admitted basing Lockhart on her husband, not that she actually did.)


The Edinburgh Book Festival is presumably the same one you quoted in the question; I haven’t checked the publication date of the Express article.


Given that the Express retracted the claim, and she refuted it while under oath, we can assume it really wasn’t her husband.



As for the flatmate claim, the Huffington Post has a quote from the inquiry to back this up:



“I said humorously the character was Gilderoy Lockhart was based on someone I had lived with briefly,” she says. “That's true, but this person can’t probably even remember we were flatmates.”



I would not expect her to describe her ex-husband as somebody she lived with “briefly”, or as unlikely to remember that they lived together.


I’m not aware of any other details of who Lockhart was based on. For obvious reasons, she doesn’t talk about him much.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...