Skip to main content

James Potter vs. Severus Snape - any official word?



Harry Potter grew up almost hero-worshipping his father, and with a strong dislike of Snape based on Snape's resentment of him as well as some knowledge of Snape's rivalry with Harry's father while they were at school together.


In HP and the Order of the Phoenix, he finds out about (in fact, he sees first-hand via the Pensieve) his father's bullying of Snape. This changes his perception of the relationship between the two, and the revelation bothers him so much that he goes to a great deal of trouble to seek out Sirius (and Lupin) and talk to them about it.


In HP and the Deathly Hallows, he finally finds out the full story of his father and Snape's relationships with each other and with Lily, his mother. The revelations in the chapter The Prince's Tale changed many HP fans' conception of several characters, and there have been many heated debates on which of James Potter and Severus Snape was the better man.


On the one hand, James was a jerk to Snape while they were at school, and I've never been able to figure out why Lily chose him over Snape. On the other hand, James was a member of the Order of the Phoenix while Snape was a genuine Death Eater all the way up until the love of his life was in personal danger from Voldemort.


Clearly, arguments could be made either way, but I'm not looking for a speculative answer.


Has there been any statement from JK Rowling on who she thinks was the better man?



Answer



We know that at the end of the day, Snape was never a "good guy":



Snape is all grey. You can't make him a saint: he was vindictive & bullying. You can't make him a devil: he died to save the wizarding world



Snape was a bully who loved the goodness he sensed in Lily without being able to emulate her. That was his tragedy.


Snape didn't die for 'ideals'. He died in an attempt to expiate his own guilt. He could have broken cover at any time to save himself 1/2 but he chose not to tell Voldemort that the latter was making a fatal error in targeting Harry. Snape's silence ensured Harry's victory. 2/2



JKR on Twitter


Whereas in the books, everyone in the wizarding world says that James is a great guy, especially after he gets out of school/is married. Looking at JKR's recent tweets and interview comments, it appears she hasn't said much about James's character out of world.


Throughout the books, it's written that Snape's only love, and the only good things he does, are because of Lily, while James is shown to be courageous and loving towards his friends, family, and the greater good in general.



“You think I'm a fool?" demanded Harry.


"No, I think you're like James," said Lupin, "who would have regarded it as the height of dishonour to mistrust his friends.”




James ends his life attempting to save his family, Snape ends his life attempting to ease his own personal guilt.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...