Skip to main content

What canon information exists on the inspiration for the Companions in Firefly?


In answering this question, I found out about the oiran, a class of high-status courtesans in 17th-18th century Japan. Some of the description of these people sounds very similar to the Companions who feature in Joss Whedon's TV show Firefly:



Compared to yūjo (prostitutes), whose primary attraction was their sexual favors, courtesans were first and foremost entertainers. In order to become an oiran, a woman had to be educated in a range of skills, including the traditional arts of sadō (Japanese tea ceremony), ikebana (flower arranging), and calligraphy. Oiran also learned to play the koto, shakuhachi, tsuzumi (hand drum), and shamisen. Clients also expected them to be well-read and able to converse and write with wit and elegance.


Within the pleasure quarters, courtesans' prestige was based on their beauty, character, education, and artistic ability, rather than their birth.


The highest rank of courtesan was the tayū (太夫?), followed by the kōshi (格子?). Unlike a common prostitute, the tayū had sufficient prestige to refuse clients. Her high status also made a tayū extremely pricey—a tayū's fee for one evening was between one ryo and one ryo three bu, well beyond a laborer's monthly wage and comparable to a shop assistant's annual salary.


-- Wikipedia, emphasis mine




Beyond this impressive array of circumstantial evidence, is there anything in canon (e.g. interviews with Whedon) to tell us whether or not the Companions of Firefly were based on the oiran, or for that matter on any other group in real-world society?


What is known canonically about the inspiration for Companion culture?



Answer



According to Joss Whedon, Inara's character and the companions were inspired by the geisha, traditional female entretainers and by libertarian feminist perspectives on prostitution (emphasis mine):



“Inara’s character originally was a whore, something very Deadwood. My wife said, ‘Why not do something more in the style of a geisha and make her the most educated person on the ship instead of just an oppressed, pathetic creature?’ And then, of course, people [said], ‘What a typical boy fantasy.’ And I thought, ‘Yeah, that’s my wife!’ Inara obviously [is] the opposite of Mal, she represents the Alliance and everything that’s good about it—enlightenment, education, self-possession, feminism.”~ Joss Whedon, Serenity: The Official Visual Companion



To me it seems there are lots of cultural references mixed up in Inara's behaviour and the social influence of her guild, probably according to what instructions the writer of the specific episode, for example Jane Espenson got, and how she and other folks in the writers room interpreted the traditional role of the geisha and the cultural and political influence of the Companion's Guild within the Alliance after the Unification War.


Now Inara Serra provides sexual services, which was not necessarily true for the Geisha, who were high class entertainers:




" The term Geisha can be translated in one of two ways: “artist” or “entertainer” (Dalby 54-55) neither of these denotes the sexual aspect of their careers, which is important because it helps distinguish every other aspect of their teachings, not just their capability of sex. That the emphasis lies in their ability to entertain sets them apart from the yuju or Oiran."~Geisha in the Wild, Wild West: How the Companions of the ‘Verse are Influenced by Geisha Culture



So I agree with you that the companions resemble more the oiran than the geisha, or the Korean kisaeng, but there are also elements of the Greek heitarai and modern feminist ideas on prostitution and so on.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...